Rott v. Mahler - Symphonies

Started by Winky Willy, February 26, 2012, 12:01:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rott's Symphony v. Mahler's 1st  - Which do you think is the greater work?

Mahler First
Rott

Winky Willy

Which of these two masterworks do you consider superior?

North Star

"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

Bulldog

Quote from: Winky Willy on February 26, 2012, 12:01:34 PM
Which of these two masterworks do you consider superior?

Mahler's 1st.  I think you're being a little generous in describing both symphonies as masterworks.

mahler10th

 $:)
Winky, you should not have started this...lol...anyone here on GMG will tell you that I am Hans Rott #1 fan, perhaps in the World.  I have become near expert in his works and life from a non-musicians standpoint, and will argue any point, ANY POINT, in Hans Rott's favour. 

So...first it is intolerable that his first be set against Mahlers 1st for comparison.  It is known Mahler imported and tweaked some lieder accompaniements to fit the schema of his first symphony.  Rotts only symphony is a bona-fide symphony, written as a symphony and presented as a symphony.  No programme for it.  Mahler did try to cobble up a program for his admittedly brilliant first symphony, but Hans let his speak for itself.

Oh dear...you've got me going...  :o      :D

Bulldog

Quote from: Scots John on February 26, 2012, 12:15:41 PM
$:)
Winky, you should not have started this...lol...anyone here on GMG will tell you that I am Hans Rott #1 fan, perhaps in the World.  I have become near expert in his works and life from a non-musicians standpoint, and will argue any point, ANY POINT, in Hans Rott's favour. 

So...first it is intolerable that his first be set against Mahlers 1st for comparison. 

What symphony do you feel would make for a better comparison?

mahler10th

Quote from: Discobole on February 26, 2012, 12:19:35 PM
I'm not sure you can compare the two works as they are really different, but in any case, Rott's symphony remains a curiosity, a great one, but not more. Mahler's Titan is a masterpiece in itself.

Not much of a curiosity when Mahler learned and took so much from it.  Mahlers Titan isn't even Mahlers Titan.  It is not even Titan.  It is simply "Symphony No. 1 in D major" - that is how it was published.  Mahler worked on it for years...Rott was only 20 when he wrote the last bar of his first.   Oh no...now I'm getting.... >:(

mahler10th

Quote from: Bulldog on February 26, 2012, 12:20:12 PM
What symphony do you feel would make for a better comparison?

None.  But unbiased, maybe Bruckners nulte.  But I am not unbiased.  I am unequivocal when it comes to the genius that could have been.  None.

madaboutmahler

Quote from: North Star on February 26, 2012, 12:07:51 PM
Daniel, put down the hammer!

;D

Will have to go with my default choice here of course. The Rott is still a wonderful piece though.
"Music is ... A higher revelation than all Wisdom & Philosophy"
— Ludwig van Beethoven

Winky Willy

Bulldog, you must have a rather remarkably high standard for judging mastery!

Bulldog

Quote from: Winky Willy on February 26, 2012, 02:06:11 PM
Bulldog, you must have a rather remarkably high standard for judging mastery!

No, just not a low standard.  From my view, masters in any profession/endeavor are the cream of the crop and rather rare.  I'm always surprised at the number of relatively obscure composers who are touted on this board as masters of composition and inspiration.

Rott might well have been a master if he had the time and experience; we'll never know.

Winky Willy

I agree that too many obscure composers are presented by their devotees as masters, but in all seriousness, I believe the Mahler and Rott symphonies are a different beast.

mahler10th

Quote from: Winky Willy on February 26, 2012, 02:41:28 PM
I agree that too many obscure composers are presented by their devotees as masters, but in all seriousness, I believe the Mahler and Rott symphonies are a different beast.

I too agree that Rott cannot be considered a 'Master', such an idea is outrageous.  He died too young and his known compositions are too few.  What he did though, was set the soundscape path for his contemporary master(s) to blaze upon. 

Lisztianwagner

Quite easy, Mahler's symphony No.1 for me. :)
"You cannot expect the Form before the Idea, for they will come into being together." - Arnold Schönberg

mszczuj

There is no way to compare symphony you have heard 3 times with symphony you have heard about 70 times.

Sergeant Rock

As part of GMG's Rott Mafia, and a certified Mahler nut, I'm not going to touch this poll  8)

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

J.Z. Herrenberg

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on Today at 17:11:48
As part of GMG's Rott Mafia,
and a certified Mahler nut, I'm not going to touch this poll  8)

Sarge



;D
Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything. -- Plato

mahler10th

I hereby declare myself the Capo di tutti capi of the GMG Hans Rott Mafia.  Only the delivery of a fish wrapped in brown paper to Dennis Russell Davies or...er...Cato, will mean that the situation has changed.  So...tell some of the button men holed up in Cleveland to pay our friend Mahler a little visit...salute!    >:D