Quiz: Mystery scores

[listener]

Listener 5   The orchestra stays piano and strings.    Might be obscure, but if you've got a couple of these you could see a pattern that's a  clue

[listener]

Listener 6 (former no.1)
There is a very famous quotation at the start, which is usually described as meaning something that actually happens at the next entry.  I've extended it to the next system.   

[Maciek]

Set by Maciek
93 - ten Holt - Canto Ostinato - (Dax)
94 - Tchaikovsky - Un poco de Chopin - (Luke)
95 - Szymanowski - Prelude and Fugue - (Luke)
96 - ? -
97 - ? -
98 - Stojowski - Cello sonata - (Luke)
99 - ? -
100 - Chopin - Sonata no 3 - (Luke)
101 - Szymanowski - Violin Sonata arr cello - (Guido)
102 - Szymanowski - Prelude and Fugue - (Luke)
103 - Paderewski - Symphony - (Luke)
104 - Szymanowski - Myths (Dryads and Pan) - (Dax)
105 - ? -
106 - Bacewicz - PIano Sonata no 2 - (Taxes)
107 - ? -
108 - Bacewicz - Music for String, Trumpets and Percussion - (Luke)
109 - ? -
110 - ? -
111 - ? -
112 - ? -
113 - Szymanowski - Quartet no 2 - (Taxes)
114 - Bacewicz - String Quartet no 7 - (Taxes)
115 - ? -
116 - ? -
117 - ? -
118 - ? -
119 - ? -
120 - ? -

Guess this is long overdue, but some of these are just so mainstream... What is wrong with you people?

Seriously, though, I was expecting some sort of reaction to 96, 97, 105. 112 maybe? 110, 111? No? No one?

118 had experienced a short revival recently, or so I imagined...

96 - Friedman Minuet from Mahler's 3rd
97 - Wieniawski Faust Fantasie

99 - Różycki Cello Sonata

105 - Bacewicz Sonat for violin solo no. 2

107 - Bacewicz Contradizione for chamber orchestra

109 - Bacewicz Symphony no. 3
110 - Bacewicz Oberek no. 1 vn pfte
111 - Bacewicz Divertimento strings
112 - Szymanowski SQ1

115 - Bacewicz SQ6
116 - Bacewicz SQ5
117 - Bacewicz SQ3
118 - Bacewicz Pno quint no. 2

Actually, according to my notes, 116 has already been guessed? Admittedly, though, the notes are rather vague and more than a bit obscure, so I might be misreading what I meant...? At least please don't go ploughing through all those pages on my account, because the search will very likely turn out nothing.

I'm leaving 119 and 120 unrevealed, as they were supposed to lead on to a few more scans, which I'm sure I will discover eventually (they must be somewhere on the computer).

[rappy]

It's a real killer, isn't it! I haven't tried hard on 38 yet, Rappy, because I've been busy, and I know that if I start thinking about it I'll waste hours I don't have!

Any progress yet? Hint: the piece is in E.
Hint for Sforzando: The composer wants the interpret to play it on the G string.

P.S.: If you'd enter into the highscore, we could have some opposition to the German clavio.de-players. 

[karlhenning]

But this is just the first system, of course; you're right, Maciek, it's the Symphonie voor losse snaren.  What seemed to be amiss in the description?

What do we think of this work? I thought it rather arid and dull - a shame because its such a wonderful idea.

Say! Look what I found:

http://www.youtube.com/v/r4OkBR3aZFc

[karlhenning]

(Seems to be the third of three youtube clips.)

[glindhot]

What's this?

First time looking at this great board and I can't resist havin' a guess, so here 'tis:
Myaskovsky: Symphony No 21

[rappy]

Nope. But not far away.

[rappy]

P.S.: If you'd enter into the highscore, we could have some opposition to the German clavio.de-players. 

There is a thread on clavio.de which contains some clues, e.g. concerning #38 (Luke!):

http://www.clavio.de/forum/sonstiges/11142-musikquiz-12.html

[Maciek]

I had these ready today morning, but the site was gone. A sad coincidence. Actually, wanted to post some others as well, but won't for the time being. I'm sure you'll understand why.

MM121 (this is the one directly linked to MM119; as is MM120)

[Maciek]

MM122

[Maciek]

MM123

[Maciek]

MM124

[Maciek]

MM125

[Maciek]

MM126

[Maciek]

MM127

[Maciek]

MM128

[Maciek]

MM129

[Maciek]

MM130

[greg]

MM123

Obviously the first movement of Gorecki's 3rd.