Wildest/most extreme harmony?

Started by Guido, October 13, 2009, 04:38:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Guido

Quote from: jochanaan on October 16, 2009, 12:42:02 PM
Here are a few examples "hiding in plain sight" among accepted masterpieces:

Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, last movement, the second appearance of the Presto: the first chord contains every note of the D harmonic minor scale! ;D

Chopin, Opus 28, Prelude #2 in A minor: the tonality never becomes clear at all until the last harmonic cadence.

Bruckner, Ninth Symphony, third movement: the final climax ends on another every-note-in-the-scale chord, completely unresolved. :o :D

Cheers for these! What do you mean by the last climax in the Bruckner? c.5mins before the end?
Geologist.

The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away

jochanaan

Quote from: Guido on October 17, 2009, 03:54:54 PM
Cheers for these! What do you mean by the last climax in the Bruckner? c.5mins before the end?
I'd have to check timings, but that's probably the one.  It begins with the upper woodwinds playing the second theme slowly over a stalking bass and murmuring violins, builds long and slow to a restatement of the main theme in low brass, fff, and ends with that in-your-face dissonance followed by a dramatic pause; the music continues with one of Bruckner's typical bold yet inevitable tonal shifts. 8)
Imagination + discipline = creativity

Ten thumbs

You may also find the note clusters in D. Scarlatti's sonatas of interest. The ones I know are in K119 and K175 but there may be others. Both these sonatas are very upbeat classical style works.
A day may be a destiny; for life
Lives in but little—but that little teems
With some one chance, the balance of all time:
A look—a word—and we are wholly changed.

Superhorn

  There's an amazing piano piece by Smetana ,which was later orchestrated by another composer called"Macbeth and the Witches".  You'd won't believe it's by a 19th century composer when you hear it.
  I have a recording on the Urania label, probably out of print by Vaclav Smetacek and the Prague sympnony(not the Czech Philharmonic.)  You have to hear this to believe it.

Guido

Ah yes Scarlatti of course - 175 is the one I know too - mad percussive stuff.

Am listening to the Smetana now - fun piece.
Geologist.

The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away

greg

Quote from: James on October 19, 2009, 07:59:11 AM
Give it some time kid, one day you'll see the light. keep listening.
In other words, (cough)... no, I can't prove... (cough)... that Bach's harmony was more wild or extreme... (cough)... than the ones listed on this... (cough)

greg

Quote from: James on October 19, 2009, 02:56:44 PM
this is not something that needs to be "proved", it's truth.  all i can to any doubters is keep listening, because as I said earlier ... everything "wild" here is rendered a pretty tame experience next to Bach's harmonic insight & profundity...
Yeah, and the world is flat just because I say it's so and it's truth.  >:D  ;D
Of course, his music is great, and insightful, but not exactly "wild" harmonically in comparison to some of the examples on this thread, if that's what you mean to say (and the proof is in the scores).

greg

Quote from: James on October 19, 2009, 03:08:18 PM
the examples posted are so earthbound & tame not as good-sounding compared to Bach's harmony.
So a cluster and a section of music that is played in several different keys is less tame than a standard Bach piece?  ???

...

Now, I would agree with this correction, which is what you obviously mean to say- but saying it's less tame makes absolutely no sense, unless you want to define 'tame' as something else.

greg

Quote from: James on October 19, 2009, 03:17:36 PM
Yup, a much much MUCH tamer experience than what you get with Bach. Absolutely.


If you mean the experience itself and not the harmony, okay then...

Scarpia

Before 1900, there is a passage, I can't quite place it, perhaps in the sloe movement of Mozart's string quintet in D, that is almost atonal for a moment.  In Bach, there is the chorale that happens just after the Jesus' death in the St Matthew Passion that is rather extreme. 

jochanaan

Quote from: Greg on October 19, 2009, 03:04:56 PM
Yeah, and the world is flat just because I say it's so and it's truth.  >:D  ;D
Of course, his music is great, and insightful, but not exactly "wild" harmonically in comparison to some of the examples on this thread, if that's what you mean to say (and the proof is in the scores).
Oh, I don't know, some of it can get pretty wild.  Have you ever really listened to the harmonies in the D minor Toccata and Fugue? :o Or the tonal shifts in the first (C Major) prelude from The Well-Tempered Claver, Book I? 8)
Imagination + discipline = creativity

greg

Quote from: jochanaan on October 19, 2009, 07:50:23 PM
Oh, I don't know, some of it can get pretty wild.  Have you ever really listened to the harmonies in the D minor Toccata and Fugue? :o Or the tonal shifts in the first (C Major) prelude from The Well-Tempered Claver, Book I? 8)
Yeah, it can, but I've never heard him write in multiple keys at the same time.  ;D

listener

And then there is the effect on "normal" tonality when ou use mean-tone tuning.   Buxtehude can startle when heard unexpectedly on a mean-tone organ (Loft 1090-1091, for instance).
And getting 20th century, the sounds from the tunings by Alois Haba can remind one of Jonathan and Darlene Edwards.
"Keep your hand on the throttle and your eye on the rail as you walk through life's pathway."

Cato

Parallel with Gesualdo: A good number of songs in Hugo Wolf's oeuvre qualify here!

See especially the Spanisches Liederbuch.  Perhaps not "wild" or "extreme" in a Mountain-Dew skateboard way   8)  but...
"Meet Miss Ruth Sherwood, from Columbus, Ohio, the Middle of the Universe!"

- Brian Aherne introducing Rosalind Russell in  My Sister Eileen (1942)

Ten thumbs

I thought the idea of this thread was to report examples of wild or extreme harmonies not instances of profundity and harmonic insight. If James does not believe that other composers besides Bach had deep understanding of harmony then he has a lot to learn indeed.
A day may be a destiny; for life
Lives in but little—but that little teems
With some one chance, the balance of all time:
A look—a word—and we are wholly changed.

greg

Quote from: Ten thumbs on October 23, 2009, 01:14:33 PM
I thought the idea of this thread was to report examples of wild or extreme harmonies not instances of profundity and harmonic insight. If James does not believe that other composers besides Bach had deep understanding of harmony then he has a lot to learn indeed.
Definitely. Anyone who can read music can see that Bach, like many composers, wrote with the harmony of his time and did sometimes get much more imaginative- but it's not like his harmony was so extreme for his time that it was non-Baroque, or something.
Just study some of his scores, James, if you know how to read music.
Fanaticism can be fine, as long as it doesn't get nonsensical. While you're at it, just say that Bach was the greatest keyboardist who ever lived because he had insight to which notes he should struck while composing.  ::)

bwv 1080

Bach's harmony is extreme compared to Handel, Rameau or any other Baroque composer (although Scarlatti is likely the closest).  You can find just about every standard jazz harmony somewhere in Bach's output as well as chromaticism equal to anything before Wagner

Compare Bach's Chaccone in Dm with Handel's Variations on the same theme to get an idea of Bach's greater sophistication

greg

It was advanced, but I'm not sure most of it would be appropriate for this thread... I was thinking more of the examples that were already given.

prémont

The most extreme harmony (in tonal music), I can recall at the moment, is the conclusion of
Kyrie, Gott heiliger Geist BWV 671 (great organo pleno version) from Clavierübung III by J S Bach.
Reality trumps our fantasy far beyond imagination.

Ten thumbs

Whilst Bach's chromatic harmony was ideal for the late Baroque period, one would be deluded to suppose that such skill in harmony somehow disappeared after his death. Great harmonic complexity was swept away by the ethos of the new Classic era, which dwelt in the beauty of clear simplicity (relatively). Thus one of the hallmarks of the early Classical style is the use of a single harmony per bar. However, Mozart, Haydn and no doubt many others, were quite capable of harmonic ingenuity whenever they felt it appropriate (e.g in development passages). The next stage (the Romantic) sees the accompaniment assume a life of its own, challenging the theme and conflicting with it harmonically leading back to chromaticism, as in Wagner etc. 
One result of this is that a dissonance is likely to sound more extreme in a Classical work than in either Baroque or Romantic music.
A day may be a destiny; for life
Lives in but little—but that little teems
With some one chance, the balance of all time:
A look—a word—and we are wholly changed.