Dmitri's Dacha

Started by karlhenning, April 09, 2007, 08:13:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mirror Image

Quote from: ChamberNut on May 22, 2016, 06:04:49 AM
Thank you, John.  :)  I do browse the forum at least weekly, but haven't been in the mood to post.  Have had something difficult occur in my personal life, so working through that each day, and things are getting better.

I'm sorry to hear this, Ray. Wishing you well through this period.

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on May 22, 2016, 06:10:31 AM
I'm sorry to hear this, Ray. Wishing you well through this period.

Me too.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

vandermolen

#1542
My favourite version of Symphony 8 - in a class of its own IMHO. I'm delighted that Warner have reissued it with the striking original LP cover image, which is one of my favourites. Pity, for me, that the booklet notes are exclusively in Japanese:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Symphony-8-Shostakovich/dp/B01A61C69A/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1465147554&sr=1-1&keywords=shostakovich+Previn
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

jlaurson

Quote from: ChamberNut on May 22, 2016, 06:04:49 AM
Thank you, John.  :)  I do browse the forum at least weekly, but haven't been in the mood to post.  Have had something difficult occur in my personal life, so working through that each day, and things are getting better.



Cheers & tenacity!

vandermolen

Quote from: jlaurson on June 06, 2016, 01:45:25 AM


Cheers & tenacity!
I don't think that particular piece of music would cheer Schroeder up! Very nice though.  8)
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

North Star

Quote from: vandermolen on June 06, 2016, 09:31:51 AM
I don't think that particular piece of music would cheer Schroeder up! Very nice though.  8)
It is the buying of records that cheers Schroeder up, so maybe the listening experience is more trivial. ;)
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

Karl Henning

Quote from: North Star on June 06, 2016, 09:38:57 AM
It is the buying of records that cheers Schroeder up, so maybe the listening experience is more trivial. ;)

Though it be not light-hearted, exactly, I do find the scherzo cheering . . .

http://www.youtube.com/v/zJN2rbMEozI
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

vandermolen

Quote from: North Star on June 06, 2016, 09:38:57 AM
It is the buying of records that cheers Schroeder up, so maybe the listening experience is more trivial. ;)
That's absolutely true! Certainly in my case. So, even Pettersson's 'The Dead in the Marketplace' would have had the same effect.  8)
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

jlaurson

Quote from: vandermolen on June 06, 2016, 09:31:51 AM
Quote from: jlaurson on June 06, 2016, 01:45:25 AM


Cheers & tenacity!
I don't think that particular piece of music would cheer Schroeder up! Very nice though.  8)


Yes, the ironic choice of works, pertinent to this thread, was sufficient to make me chuckle to myself. But then, I'm easily amused.  :)

vandermolen

Quote from: jlaurson on June 06, 2016, 10:43:11 PM
I don't think that particular piece of music would cheer Schroeder up! Very nice though.  8)



Yes, the ironic choice of works, pertinent to this thread, was sufficient to make me chuckle to myself. But then, I'm easily amused.  :)
It made me laugh too.  :)
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Scion7

   ç1973

Oistrakh was satisfied with his performance.
Remastered in 2005.
Saint-Saëns, who predicted to Charles Lecocq in 1901: 'That fellow Ravel seems to me to be destined for a serious future.'

vandermolen

#1551
Quote from: Scion7 on June 24, 2016, 02:34:55 PM
   ç1973

Oistrakh was satisfied with his performance.
Remastered in 2005.
That's a great performance. Just listening to the Ormandy recording of Symphony 1. I think that 'Shostakovich becomes Shostakovich' in the coda of that work in the same way that 'Sibelius becomes Sibelius' (and moves away from the influence of Tchaikovsky) in Symphony 3 or perhaps the last movement of Symphony 2. I very much enjoy Shostakovich's 1st Symphony, especially in Ormandy's fine performance.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Scion7

#1552
This will cause M.I. to leap from his chair and head for the batpole!



[asin]B01E6IEJ4O[/asin]

Saint-Saëns, who predicted to Charles Lecocq in 1901: 'That fellow Ravel seems to me to be destined for a serious future.'

jlaurson

Quote from: Scion7 on June 24, 2016, 02:34:55 PM
   ç1973

Oistrakh was satisfied with his performance.


;D ;) and Maxim does his best Peter Sellars impression.  8)

vandermolen

That fine train photo crops up here too:
[asin]B000025XTR[/asin]
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Scion7

While of course "good," the Greenwich Trio still tops all for the second Piano Trio - the live event from the Slovakian broadcast (all movements out there on YT) has the most passion of any performance of this piece.  Shame they disbanded.

Recommended for the Viola sonata.
Saint-Saëns, who predicted to Charles Lecocq in 1901: 'That fellow Ravel seems to me to be destined for a serious future.'

Pat B

Quote from: jlaurson on June 28, 2016, 04:22:18 AM
;D ;) and Maxim does his best Peter Sellars impression.  8)

Peter Sellars or Peter Sellers?

Brian

A random comment: listening to the Fifth Symphony a couple times this month, under Bernstein (live in Tokyo) and Kreizberg (PentaTone), I've come to the more general conclusion that I am pro-fast ending and anti-slow ending. I remember at a younger age being gobsmacked by how terrifyingly sad and oppressive the slow ending is, but the truth is, it's still brutal when played quickly. Hard to believe that anybody at the time was convinced this was a "happy ending" - even blazing-fast Lenny brings out the major/minor-key ambiguity and the eerie discord of all those repeated notes. It's unsettling as written, and my current thinking is that stretching the ending out as long as possible is overkill.

amw

According to the metronome marks the end of the fourth movement should be exactly double the speed of the beginning, so that the timpani D-A ostinato remains the same speed.

I think the performance that best illustrates Shostakovich's metronome marks is Wigglesworth/BBCNOW. Also a good one in general. Maybe one of my favourites I'm not sure. Shostakovich does not want a fast tempo for the movement; the basic tempo is quarter = 88 (although he composes in an accelerando to quarter = 126, iirc, for the second theme) and the coda is obviously half = 88. Most performers I've noticed play the movement a lot faster than he seems to have wanted.

Mirror Image

I prefer a faster ending a la Bernstein's Tokyo performance. I had to raise my eyebrow at the choice of Wigglesworth from amw. I own most of his Shostakovich recordings (on BIS) and think he lacked intensity in all of the performances I've heard. I mean we all have our favorites, but you'd pick Wigglesworth over conductors like Mravinsky, Kondrashin, Haitink, Maxim Shostakovich, Petrenko, Barshai, etc.? Also, sometimes what the composer wants doesn't always happen. I remember David Diamond being very unhappy with Bernstein's performance of his Symphony No. 4, but that was a great performance IMHO despite what the composer thought.