Unpopular Opinions

[Florestan]

Tell me your preferred plural of "octopus" and I'll tell you why it's probably wrong...

Octopussies? 

[Florestan]

the plural of opus is opera.

As per Merriam-Webster, opuses can be used as well.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opus

[Brian]

What that is, is fake learning where people forget they're speaking English.

Tell me your preferred plural of "octopus" and I'll tell you why it's probably wrong...

According to Garner's Modern American Usage:

"Because this word is actually of Greek origin -- not Latin -- the classical plural is octopodes, not octopi. But the standard plural in American and British English is octopuses. Still, some writers mistakenly use the supposed latin plural. Occasionally the pedantical octopodes appears, but it is relatively rare."

However you may wish to temper your enthusiasm for Garner's Modern American Usage after reading this entry from the letter P:

"Pubes (pubic hair) has two syllables, pyoo-beez. It's sometimes mispronounced 'pyoobs'."

Shameful post.

I do like the booklet where Charles Mingus asked his psychoanalyst to try writing about music. And any where the musicians get to speak for themselves (again a luxury usually only afforded to Mingus).

[North Star]

According to Garner's Modern American Usage:

"Because this word is actually of Greek origin -- not Latin -- the classical plural is octopodes, not octopi. But the standard plural in American and British English is octopuses. Still, some writers mistakenly use the supposed latin plural. Occasionally the pedantical octopodes appears, but it is relatively rare."

However you may wish to temper your enthusiasm for Garner's Modern American Usage after reading this entry from the letter P:

"Pubes (pubic hair) has two syllables, pyoo-beez. It's sometimes mispronounced 'pyoobs'."

I do like the booklet where Charles Mingus asked his psychoanalyst to try writing about music. And any where the musicians get to speak for themselves (again a luxury usually only afforded to Mingus).

Garner's is right on both issues, but of course the frequency of the two-syllable pronunciation of pubis is about the same as the use of the Greek plural form 'octopodes'. And, yeah.. those old jazz liner notes can be painful/funny reading.

[Brian]

Let's reboot this thread with a bang!

Sinfonia domestica > Ein Heldenleben

[ritter]

Let's reboot this thread with a bang!

Sinfonia domestica > Ein Heldenleben

Last night's electoral debate, and now this!...The end is nigh! 

[amw]

The Star Wars Extended Universe (now known as Star Wars Legends) is superior to the Disney reboot and sequel trilogy, but not because it's better written/produced (it isn't) or has more interesting ideas or whatever (it doesn't). It's the sheer unbridled chaos of dozens of writers working to tight deadlines and largely unaware of each other's work that makes it charming. I much prefer a canon where the Death Star has at least four separate origin stories, all dashed off by different writers in limited detail thanks to time constraints, to one where it has a single definitive origin within a streamlined and unified canon.

For the same reason, most fanfiction is superior to canonical sequels within blockbuster, mass-market media franchises. Audience fragmentation is actually good.

[amw]

On a related note, I'm tired of people trying to finish Mahler's 10th when they could instead be writing Mahler's 11th.

[Biffo]

Let's reboot this thread with a bang!

Sinfonia domestica > Ein Heldenleben

... or possibly Sinfonia domestica just a rehash of Ein Heldenleben with bathwater

[Jo498]

For the same reason, most fanfiction is superior to canonical sequels within blockbuster, mass-market media franchises.

This sounds like damning with faint praise. I admit that in the early 2000s during the long wait between Harry Potter vols. 5 and 6? I sunk to reading one or two fanfictions. They were more like Bridget Jones novels (of which I have not read any but back in the 1990s I watched "Singles" and "Sleepless in Seattle" which are a bit like US parallels, I guess) with the HP protagonists young professionals in the 20s and entangled in love polygons. Utter trash!

To me Star Wars seems one of the most overrated things in the last 50 years (and as I admitted above I am not beyond enjoying some fantasy/SF, although I prefer books). I am a bit too young to have seen them in the theaters when they came out (some classmates did see Return of the Jedi, I was in 5th grade or so, but I was not that interested and my parents would not have allowed it anyway). When I saw them on TV/video in the 1990s (then in my mid-20s) I found them mildly entertaining but not special at all. I could not be bothered to watch any of the later films. So first I was too young, then too old. It doesn't feel like a great loss.

[amw]

This sounds like damning with faint praise. I admit that in the early 2000s during the long wait between Harry Potter vols. 5 and 6? I sunk to reading one or two fanfictions. They were more like Bridget Jones novels (of which I have not read any but back in the 1990s I watched "Singles" and "Sleepless in Seattle" which are a bit like US parallels, I guess) with the HP protagonists young professionals in the 20s and entangled in love polygons. Utter trash!

To me Star Wars seems one of the most overrated things in the last 50 years (and as I admitted above I am not beyond enjoying some fantasy/SF, although I prefer books). I am a bit too young to have seen them in the theaters when they came out (some classmates did see Return of the Jedi, I was in 5th grade or so, but I was not that interested and my parents would not have allowed it anyway). When I saw them on TV/video in the 1990s (then in my mid-20s) I found them mildly entertaining but not special at all. I could not be bothered to watch any of the later films. So first I was too young, then too old. It doesn't feel like a great loss.

I think Star Wars is a uniquely American pathology in a lot of respects—I'm not aware of any other places in the world it has taken off. Perhaps more specifically an American liberal pathology: the original trilogy was essentially a cultural critique of the Vietnam era with America itself portrayed as the evil "Empire" and the Jedi and Rebels standing in for the Vietcong (at least that's how it was read by American critics). The prequel trilogy, which came out when I was a child/young teenager, was largely read as a broader critique of American materialism and militarism showing how a nominally democratic yet corrupt Galactic Republic became an Empire, with Revenge of the Sith (2005, I was ~13) seen as a repudiation of George W. Bush in particular. So virtually all of the "meanings" of the series only really have resonance for American audiences.

Also (I'm sure this is obvious but) the target audience for all of these films was children and teenagers. For example my main interest in Revenge of the Sith was not the movie itself (which I never watched in full) but the tie-in Lego sets.

I still think even with fanfiction being largely as you describe it, it still ends up being superior to most of the official canonical material, which is meant more as an indictment of the canonical material. For example the later Harry Potter books are bloated, poorly written, poorly edited rehashes of the original book, as it became more a franchise and merchandising opportunity than a genuine creative project, whereas the fanfiction at least shows a certain amount of passion and interest in the premise. Fanfiction is mostly written by and for teenage girls, so there is a strong focus on romance and sex (due to teenage girls being what they are); I remember after Revenge of the Sith came out there were a large number of fans who thought the canonical romance between Hayden Christensen and Natalie Portman was poorly written, and therefore rewrote the trilogy in order to instead pair up Hayden Christensen with Ewan MacGregor. That's roughly the equivalent of writing your own coda to Prokofiev 7, which I also think is valid.

In general though yes you're not missing anything. But I think that's a fairly popular opinion, these days....

[amw]

Anyway here's a musical opinion: the two-piano version of Rachmaninov's Symphonic Dances is far superior to the orchestral version.

[Brian]

Anyway here's a musical opinion: the two-piano version of Rachmaninov's Symphonic Dances is far superior to the orchestral version.

I got a CD of the Ashkenazy-Previn version and maybe it's just the pressing/mastering, but between the super rickety pianos and exaggerated stereo separation, it sounds like the engineers found out about stereo that very morning, and is just the most ridiculously exciting thing. Really blew the dust out of my ears.

[Biffo]

Anyway here's a musical opinion: the two-piano version of Rachmaninov's Symphonic Dances is far superior to the orchestral version.

I prefer the two-piano version but wouldn't say it is 'far superior'

[Jo498]

I am not familiar enough with the Rachmaninov (esp. not the piano version) but in the case of Brahms' Hungarian dances I clearly prefer the piano (NOT in the case of the f minor quintet/sonata or the Haydn variations although I could concede that the piano versions are relatively underappreciated) whereas in the case of Dvoraks Slavonic dances I like the orchestral version much better. (This is probably a common, not unpopular opinion.)

[Florestan]

Where are the opinions supposed to be unpopular, on GMG or in the world at large? Sometimes the two categories are polar opposites.   

[Brian]

in the case of Brahms' Hungarian dances I clearly prefer the piano

Any love for piano-violin arrangements by e.g. Joachim?

[BWV 1080]

Schubert is boring

[Brian]

Schubert is boring

You win.

[Jo498]

Any love for piano-violin arrangements by e.g. Joachim?

I own a disc of them (whereas I do not have a complete recording of the orchestral version atm) but I cannot say that I am familiar with these versions. Historically they could be closer to the source material or at least to what Brahms might have played with or heard from Remenyi as a very young man. Probably listened to them once or twice and not sure how impressed I was. In either shape it's music I like when I am listening to it but admittedly do not put on that often.
I am very inconsistent about arrangements/alternative versions. I am more open to them with "lighter" music like these dances but I also used to prefer some of Bach's organ pieces for orchestra or piano. This has changed with a deeper appreciation of the organ (still not a really avid fan of the instrument).