Worst looking CD/LP artwork

[Peter Power Pop]

Clearly, after decades marked by clarity, recognisability, and genuine informational value, we have drifted into an age of visual uncertainty that borders on the nonsensical.

This fashion no longer afflicts only dubious ventures by obscure performers, for whom absurdity has always been something of a professional obligation, almost mandatory. It has now reached even the most venerable and respected institutions, with ensembles of the stature of the Berlin Philharmonic being dressed in packaging that can only be described as preposterous.

In the case of Schoenberg, such excess may be forgiven, even welcomed, since the music itself thrives on provocation. With Beethoven, however, language itself falters. In earlier times, anyone responsible for such an offence would have been escorted into the courtyard and corrected with a bundle of birch rods.

Ugh.

[Peter Power Pop]

Possibly the least helpful cover for a recording of The Planets I think I've ever seen:



For anyone interested in the identity of the performer, it's the Boston Symphony Orchestra conducted by William Steinberg.

[Details at Discogs]

[JBS]

Possibly the least helpful cover for a recording of The Planets I think I've ever seen:



For anyone interested in the identity of the performer, it's the Boston Symphony Orchestra conducted by William Steinberg.

[Details at Discogs]

At least it tells you the name of the composer and the music being performed. The Berlin Philharmonic covers Another Spin posted give no information, unless it's using a code whose key is unknown to me.

[AnotherSpin]

At least it tells you the name of the composer and the music being performed. The Berlin Philharmonic covers Another Spin posted give no information, unless it's using a code whose key is unknown to me.

Yes, there is a code.

The album covers released under the Berliner Philharmoniker Recordings label communicate one of the most bankrupt messages in contemporary design: a fetishized "modernity" that erases beauty, emotion, and meaning, replacing them with arbitrary blocks of color and stripes anyone could assemble in minutes. This is not abstraction with purpose; it is emptiness pretending to be intelligence.

One cover is a chaotic smear of clashing blues, neon green, and shrill red-orange, visually aggressive yet semantically void. The other reduces itself to prison-like black-and-white stripes with a limp yellow interruption, sealed in a pseudo-artistic display case. Neither suggests Beethoven, Brahms, or Mahler. These are not album covers. They are visual sedatives, meant to numb judgment while signaling false sophistication.

This is not an isolated design failure but a symptom of cultural decay. It reflects the triumph of relativism in art, where craftsmanship, hierarchy, and mastery are dismantled in favor of democratized mediocrity. The underlying message is poisonous: any lazy, skill-less idea deserves the same status as work forged through discipline and genius. It is the visual claim that a child's finger-painting is equal to a Rembrandt, all in the name of inclusivity and anti-elitism. Classical music packaging, once dignified and evocative, has been reduced to corporate sludge.

Worse still, these covers actively sever ties with tradition and human warmth, celebrating sterile abstraction that alienates rather than elevates. By pairing this emotional vacuum with music of profound order and passion, they collapse the boundary between the sacred and the vacuous. Cultural suicide is repackaged as progress, flattening a great institution into interchangeable streaming thumbnails.

But the covers are only the beginning. The same logic is already moving toward performance itself. Bad playing will soon be marketed as equal or superior to excellence. Sluggish, inaccurate, undisciplined performances will be praised as "authentic," "vulnerable," or "deconstructive," while great interpretations are dismissed as elitist. Mediocrity, once hidden, will be aggressively celebrated as moral virtue.

The groundwork is already laid: fashionable mediocrity receives institutional praise, while mastery is treated as suspect. Incompetence will be elevated precisely because it proves that standards are optional. These album covers are propaganda for that future. They whisper that depth, skill, and meaning no longer matter. Soon the music will follow, and we will be told that a wretched performance deserves the same reverence as Karajan, Furtwängler, or Abbado.

That future is not hypothetical. It is already being rehearsed.

[Peter Power Pop]

Seen over at the "What are you listening 2 now?" thread:

[Madiel]

Seen over at the "What are you listening 2 now?" thread:

Whereas it's somebody else's favourite cover of the series.

Are you familiar with the series?

Presumably you don't like the pose. Because the photography is excellent.

[Peter Power Pop]

Whereas it's somebody else's favourite cover of the series.

Are you familiar with the series?

I am. I think they're all enjoyably silly.

Presumably you don't like the pose. Because the photography is excellent.

The photography throughout the series has been superb. Very arty.

I think it is the pose that makes me go "Huh?". The lady in question looks to me like she's screaming at the top of her lungs, which for me doesn't say "classical music", especially Vivaldi.

But each to their own. One man's meat is another man's poison. You say "tomato", I say "tomato" etc.

[Madiel]

I think it is the pose that makes me go "Huh?". The lady in question looks to me like she's screaming at the top of her lungs, which for me doesn't say "classical music", especially Vivaldi.

Clearly you don't listen to opera.

Although this isn't an opera recording. I confess to not seeing a connection between this particular image and its album, whereas quite a lot of the series do have a direct connection (especially the opera ones). There's an interview somewhere that explains the process with the photographer for almost all the series, ie they explain the content of the album to him and then leave it up to him.

But I again feel that "huh?" isn't a great basis for putting it on the worst cover art thread. I've lost count of the number of times that a "huh?" on this thread has been explained. And I'm not even sure that an explanation is necessary if a cover is artistically attractive.

If you think the photography is superb, maybe the WORST LOOKING thread (for that phrase is in the title) is not a smart place to post about it.

[71 dB]

Seen over at the "What are you listening 2 now?" thread:

Björk comes to my mind. She could have album art like this.

[Peter Power Pop]

Clearly you don't listen to opera.

Although this isn't an opera recording. I confess to not seeing a connection between this particular image and its album, whereas quite a lot of the series do have a direct connection (especially the opera ones). There's an interview somewhere that explains the process with the photographer for almost all the series, ie they explain the content of the album to him and then leave it up to him.

But I again feel that "huh?" isn't a great basis for putting it on the worst cover art thread. I've lost count of the number of times that a "huh?" on this thread has been explained. And I'm not even sure that an explanation is necessary if a cover is artistically attractive.

If you think the photography is superb, maybe the WORST LOOKING thread (for that phrase is in the title) is not a smart place to post about it.

It's far from the worst classical music covers I've ever seen, but when I first saw it it made me laugh, so I automatically put it here, thinking somebody else might get a laugh out of it too.

[Brian]

Normally it's hard to fault CPO cover designs, but...

[Brian]

another one

[Mookalafalas]

Yeah, someone's getting a bit lazy over there in the QC department. I imagine it's just because they put out so much stuff so quickly (relatively), that no one noticed the overlap.

  Most of the recent posts don't hit me as so bad. I quite like a lot of them. This, however, strikes me as pretty hideous, and it's not supposed to be. A Japanese singer's favorites. The title is simply "song" written in Japanese Katakana. It's mostly standard German repertoire, I think.

 

[Wanderer]

Normally it's hard to fault CPO cover designs, but..

Slightly different zoom levels, so I guess they thought it was OK? 

In all frankness, though, I'd much rather have duplicate paintings than the usual crap we're seeing in this thread. 

[Madiel]

Yeah, someone's getting a bit lazy over there in the QC department. I imagine it's just because they put out so much stuff so quickly (relatively), that no one noticed the overlap.

  Most of the recent posts don't hit me as so bad. I quite like a lot of them. This, however, strikes me as pretty hideous, and it's not supposed to be. A Japanese singer's favorites. The title is simply "song" written in Japanese Katakana. It's mostly standard German repertoire, I think.

 

I agree on its... hideosity. Colours, photo choice, photo cropping. All bad.

[71 dB]

Most of the recent posts don't hit me as so bad. I quite like a lot of them. This, however, strikes me as pretty hideous, and it's not supposed to be. A Japanese singer's favorites. The title is simply "song" written in Japanese Katakana. It's mostly standard German repertoire, I think.

 

Yeah, that looks like poster art for a J-Horror movie  Not RINGU but SONGU    It wasn't easy to find a "good" photo of her (Ichiko Ijichi), but I was able to do this to hopefully improve the cover art a little bit:

[DavidW]

Normally it's hard to fault CPO cover designs, but...

Classic literature suffers the same issue. Oxford, Wordsworth, Penguin, etc., like to use classic art from the same country and time period and the result is seeing the same covers over and over.

[Brian]

That Japanese photo is a selfie, too.

[Kalevala]

That Japanese photo is a selfie, too.

Augh!  She deserves better than that.   

K

[KevinP]

I haven't heard the music, and it's quite possible the cover image is the perfect match for it. The evocation of horror seems quite deliberate.

Still, I can't help but wonder if the title is abbreviated from 'I'm coming for you, Anne-Lill'.

The font and especially its colour are garish against the photo.