Your first classical 'hero'?

Started by Mark, October 27, 2007, 07:04:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Peregrine

Quote from: Renfield on October 28, 2007, 10:29:12 AM

Concerning Argerich, didn't she marry a series of co-workers, anyway? :P

There's certainly gossip about her 'ahem' appetite...
Yes, we have no bananas

George

Quote from: Renfield on October 28, 2007, 10:29:12 AM

Concerning Argerich, didn't she marry a series of co-workers, anyway? :P


And?

That's where many people meet their significant other.  :-\

Renfield

Quote from: George on October 28, 2007, 01:03:27 PM
And?

That's where many people meet their significant other.  :-\

I meant it with regard to the likelihood of her sleeping with people in her immediate proximity. :P

George

#23
Quote from: Renfield on October 28, 2007, 01:16:12 PM
I meant it with regard to the likelihood of her sleeping with people in her immediate proximity. :P

I knew I should have taken that job as page-turner for her.   :-[

;)

Mark

Quote from: George on October 28, 2007, 01:18:45 PM
I knew I should have taken that job as page-turner for her.   :-[

;)

Head turner, more like. ;)

Solitary Wanderer

This guy [having a 'bad hair' day]  ;)

'I lingered round them, under that benign sky: watched the moths fluttering among the heath and harebells, listened to the soft wind breathing through the grass, and wondered how any one could ever imagine unquiet slumbers for the sleepers in that quiet earth.' ~ Emily Bronte


Mark

Quote from: longears on October 28, 2007, 09:33:26 AM
Heard him conduct the Pittsburgh in a terrific performance of Sibelius's 5th recently.  Raised him a couple of notches in my estimation.

Tricky one, is Davis. Sometimes absolutely on the money, sometimes wide of the mark. Bit like Rattle, really. But I usually put a good deal of faith in both.

Renfield

Quote from: Mark on October 28, 2007, 05:18:02 PM
Tricky one, is Davis. Sometimes absolutely on the money, sometimes wide of the mark. Bit like Rattle, really. But I usually put a good deal of faith in both.

You know, according to my sources, even Karajan tended to be like this; apart from the amazing streak of superb performances that marked his very late years, of course. :)

XB-70 Valkyrie

If you really dislike Bach you keep quiet about it! - Andras Schiff

12tone.

I like Harry...his ability to organize is spectacular:


Don

Shostakovich - I got hooked on his symphonies as I listened to them at the Boston Public Library.

hautbois

Unfortunately, his music making excites me.


Howard  ;D

val

Artur Rubinstein, from the moment I saw him playing in concert Brahms 3rd Sonata.

Holden

Cheers

Holden

locrian


Tsaraslondon

#36
Well firstly, Callas (no surprise there then)



then Schwarzkopf



and Janet Baker



Among instrumentalists and conductors, 3 already mentioned Martha Argerich, Jacqueline Du Pre and Karajan.

\"A beautiful voice is not enough.\" Maria Callas

PSmith08



Pierre Boulez.

Aside from his output, his rhetorical style really just hit home for me. It's hard to imagine, today, that the kindly old man with the awful comb-over could have terrified the musical establishment for much of his professional life and been a major factor in Igor Stravinsky's work in dodecaphony. There's something to be said for that sort of personality, even if you don't like him, his style, or his works.

jochanaan

Composer: Johann Sebastian you-know-who.
Conductor: Arturo Toscanini.
Instrumentalist: Marcel Tabuteau, the longtime Philadelphia principal oboist.

These three remain heroes to this day, although my taste in conductors has evolved to where Toscanini is no longer an automatic favorite.
Imagination + discipline = creativity

johnQpublic

First on the right; second on the left: