Your preferred speed of Beethoven's symphonies?

Started by Mark, November 01, 2007, 04:29:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

How do you generally like Beethoven's 'Big Nine' played?

I tend to prefer quicker tempi
29 (52.7%)
I prefer more leisurely speeds
8 (14.5%)
I'm easy either way
18 (32.7%)

Total Members Voted: 38

Dancing Divertimentian

#80
Quote from: masolino on November 07, 2007, 09:34:04 PM
Sure YOU are free to disagree with MY observations. 

Well, yes. But isn't this a discussion board? To my mind your correspondence earlier as well as here invites a least a modicum of response. Or am I wrong?

In case you're wondering, I'm certainly not trying to be a pendant.

QuoteFrankly I think going from long to "heavenly length" in everything Schubertian is overrated, if not downright a cliche. 

I could be wrong (again) but I always thought "heavenly length" meant including every repeat in performance, particularly the lengthy ones? Which can lead to "too much of a good thing".

But as to your overall point I'm not sure what you're driving at. I don't see the tie-in between what Richter does (slow first movement) to what is supposedly clichéd. You say Afanassiev is slow as well but who else slows down like these two do? Certainly not the masses! Which means these two are more anomalies than anything.

Anyways, just talking out loud...no need to answer if you don't wish to...



Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

Larry Rinkel

I would say "heavenly length," as Schumann coined the phrase, has nothing to do with performance per se, but instead refers to the expansiveness with which Schubert developed the structures of each of the four movements.

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: Larry Rinkel on November 08, 2007, 05:45:42 PM
I would say "heavenly length," as Schumann coined the phrase, has nothing to do with performance per se, but instead refers to the expansiveness with which Schubert developed the structures of each of the four movements.

Yes, perhaps from Schumann's vantage point - with his fondness for writing in the miniature - it might seem Schubert really laid on the expansiveness in his music.

But in all honesty from my 21st century vantage point I see Schubert as no more "expansive" than a great many other composers.

And no telling what Schumann would have made of the music of Wagner/Bruckner/Mahler had he lived to hear it!



Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

PerfectWagnerite

Quote from: Larry Rinkel on November 08, 2007, 05:45:42 PM
I would say "heavenly length," as Schumann coined the phrase, has nothing to do with performance per se, but instead refers to the expansiveness with which Schubert developed the structures of each of the four movements.

Maybe it's me but I never felt that Schubert achieved the same level of inspiration in the final two movements than the first two. The third movement is especially weak and repetitive, and when taken with all the indicated repeats gets wearisome real fast.

Larry Rinkel

Quote from: donwyn on November 08, 2007, 06:14:44 PM
Yes, perhaps from Schumann's vantage point - with his fondness for writing in the miniature - it might seem Schubert really laid on the expansiveness in his music.

But in all honesty from my 21st century vantage point I see Schubert as no more "expansive" than a great many other composers.

And no telling what Schumann would have made of the music of Wagner/Bruckner/Mahler had he lived to hear it!

Schumann knew some of Wagner's earlier works at least, and found them repellent. As I recall, the two men met once, and Wagner complained that Schumann didn't open his mouth while Schumann complained that it was impossible when Wagner spoke to get a word in edgewise. As for Bruckner, I think it's reasonable to say that he learned some of his expansive, leisurely style from Schubert's instrumental works.

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: Larry Rinkel on November 08, 2007, 06:22:34 PM
Schumann knew some of Wagner's earlier works at least, and found them repellent.

Early Wagner seems to induce that reaction in many folks! ;D

QuoteAs I recall, the two men met once, and Wagner complained that Schumann didn't open his mouth while Schumann complained that it was impossible when Wagner spoke to get a word in edgewise.

LOL

QuoteAs for Bruckner, I think it's reasonable to say that he learned some of his expansive, leisurely style from Schubert's instrumental works.

Interesting point. The two do seem to have the gift of erecting complex structure in leisure time.



Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

Rod Corkin

Quote from: donwyn on November 08, 2007, 06:36:07 PM
Early Wagner seems to induce that reaction in many folks! ;D


Middle and late Wagner too!
"If I were but of noble birth..." - Rod Corkin
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/classicalmusicmayhem/


Dancing Divertimentian

Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach


Dancing Divertimentian

Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

FideLeo

#91
Quote from: Larry Rinkel on November 08, 2007, 05:45:42 PM
I would say "heavenly length," as Schumann coined the phrase, has nothing to do with performance per se, but instead refers to the expansiveness with which Schubert developed the structures of each of the four movements.

The irony here is when some interpretators take the catch phrase the wrong way (as intended by Schumann it is not a cliche) and make what is suitably long in a Schubert movement (no, doing repeats doesn't make energetic music making seem one second too long) into something of an interminable drag.  That is what that particular Richter performance seems like to my ears. 
HIP for all and all for HIP! Harpsichord for Bach, fortepiano for Beethoven and pianoforte for Brahms!

FideLeo

Quote from: donwyn on November 08, 2007, 05:36:03 PM
Well, yes. But isn't this a discussion board? To my mind your correspondence earlier as well as here invites a least a modicum of response. Or am I wrong?

Yes an informative response is of merit, but mere disagreement really is neither here nor there in a discussion.
HIP for all and all for HIP! Harpsichord for Bach, fortepiano for Beethoven and pianoforte for Brahms!

BachQ

Quote from: fl.traverso on November 10, 2007, 05:55:23 AM
Yes an informative response is of merit, but mere disagreement really is neither here nor there in a discussion.

I disagree .........

karlhenning

On the radio this morning, I heard the slow movement (and that movement only) of the Fourth Symphony by Norrington and (IIRC) the COE.  Felt too fast; just a shade too fast, for the most part, but too fast.

Harry

Quote from: karlhenning on November 10, 2007, 08:14:43 AM
On the radio this morning, I heard the slow movement (and that movement only) of the Fourth Symphony by Norrington and (IIRC) the COE.  Felt too fast; just a shade too fast, for the most part, but too fast.

No,no,no, of course not too fast my friend, only too fast for you, that's the fine distinction. ;D
I let you in on a secret, I found it to be too slow......... :o
Common, Beethoven lived on a fast lane, and he was constantly arguing with the musicians in his time, and shouting, faster you bastards...honestly! :)

karlhenning

Quote from: Harry on November 10, 2007, 08:22:23 AM
No,no,no, of course not too fast my friend, only too fast for you, that's the fine distinction. ;D
I let you in on a secret, I found it to be too slow......... :o
Common, Beethoven lived on a fast lane, and he was constantly arguing with the musicians in his time, and shouting, faster you bastards...honestly! :)

Honestly, Harry, the composer marked that movement Adagio.  Norrington did not conduct that movement Adagio.

Oh, I know, I know: both you and Norrington know better than the composer.  So I withdraw my objection  ;D

Harry

Quote from: karlhenning on November 10, 2007, 08:27:46 AM
Honestly, Harry, the composer marked that movement Adagio.  Norrington did not conduct that movement Adagio.

Oh, I know, I know: both you and Norrington know better than the composer.  So I withdraw my objection ;D

Well Adagio was thrice as fast in Beethoven's time, as it now is, and I have that from high authority...... ;D

Larry Rinkel

Quote from: Harry on November 10, 2007, 08:22:23 AM
Common, Beethoven lived on a fast lane, and he was constantly arguing with the musicians in his time, and shouting, faster you bastards...honestly! :)

Where in the world did you pull that rabbit out of a hat?

karlhenning

A rarebit, rather than a rabbit, perhaps, Larry  8)