Prokofiev vs. Shostakovich

Started by Danny, November 07, 2007, 12:42:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Which composer do you prefer?

Prokofiev
Shostakovich
Can't Decide
Would Rather Be Dancing to Elgar
Doesn't Want to Answer This Poll

karlhenning


O Delvig

String Quartets: Shostakovich, obviously!
Piano Sonatas: Prokofiev, obviously!
Concertos: draw. love Prokofiev's Piano Concertos, but Shostakovich wrote those great Cello Concertos.
Symphonies: don't really listen to either's, though I enjoy Prokofiev's 2nd and Shost's 14th (I know, I'm different....)
Chamber music for strings/piano: draw. Prokofiev's Violin Sonata Op 80 is the best of the bunch and one of my favorite works, but Shostakovich wrote that great second Piano Trio and a fascinating Viola Sonata.

Final Tally: Draw!

The new erato

Quote from: spaghetti on November 20, 2007, 10:37:36 AM
String Quartets: Shostakovich, obviously!
Piano Sonatas: Prokofiev, obviously!
Concertos: draw. love Prokofiev's Piano Concertos, but Shostakovich wrote those great Cello Concertos.
Symphonies: don't really listen to either's, though I enjoy Prokofiev's 2nd and Shost's 14th (I know, I'm different....)
Chamber music for strings/piano: draw. Prokofiev's Violin Sonata Op 80 is the best of the bunch and one of my favorite works, but Shostakovich wrote that great second Piano Trio and a fascinating Viola Sonata.

Final Tally: Draw!

Operas?

And Shsotakovich's op 87 goes a long way in nullifying Prokofievs superiority in the sonata area. And you forgot the great Piano Quintet. But Prokofiev is far superior in the ballet area. Film music; who knows.

Overall; I think your conclusion stands.

Danny

Yes, a draw.

I wonder what the next poll could be........................

Maybe a Rachmaninov vs. Glazunov.  ;D

greg

Quote from: Danny on November 20, 2007, 12:39:04 PM
Yes, a draw.

I wonder what the next poll could be........................

Maybe a Rachmaninov vs. Glazunov.  ;D
i think we all know who'd win that one

Bogey

Quote from: Danny on November 20, 2007, 12:39:04 PM
Yes, a draw.

I wonder what the next poll could be........................

Maybe a Rachmaninov vs. Glazunov.  ;D

What?!  With your avatar you know better than that Danny.  At the very least have a split decision with a $84 million dollar rematch scheduled for 6 months later.  ;D
There will never be another era like the Golden Age of Hollywood.  We didn't know how to blow up buildings then so we had no choice but to tell great stories with great characters.-Ben Mankiewicz

Don

Quote from: Danny on November 20, 2007, 12:39:04 PM
Yes, a draw.


Not according to the poll results.

My own take is:

Solo - Shosty
Chamber - Shosty
Orchestral - Shosty
Voice - Take your pick.

O Delvig

Quote from: erato on November 20, 2007, 10:43:28 AM
Operas?

And Shsotakovich's op 87 goes a long way in nullifying Prokofievs superiority in the sonata area. And you forgot the great Piano Quintet. But Prokofiev is far superior in the ballet area. Film music; who knows.

Overall; I think your conclusion stands.

Yep, I agree the preludes and fugues and Piano Quintet are great works I didn't mention. Overall Shostakovich probably produced more works that I enjoy, but I have to say he wrote some real garbage too.... ;D ;D.....whereas I can't think of any of Prokofiev's work that I don't at least appreciate. However, I've yet to develop a taste for opera or ballet, unfortunately.

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: Don on November 20, 2007, 03:25:46 PM
Not according to the poll results.

The margin of error is 8% so that could shore up Prokofiev's end. ;D



Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

karlhenning

Quote from: spaghetti on November 20, 2007, 10:37:36 AM
Symphonies: don't really listen to either's, though I enjoy Prokofiev's 2nd and Shost's 14th

Excellent choices!

Danny

Quote from: Bogey on November 20, 2007, 03:25:18 PM
What?!  With your avatar you know better than that Danny.  At the very least have a split decision with a $84 million dollar rematch scheduled for 6 months later.  ;D

Both are Russian, I say in Madison Square Garden or Atlantic City to fatten up that attendance.

Bogey

#111
Quote from: Danny on November 21, 2007, 01:34:13 PM
Both are Russian, I say in Madison Square Garden or Atlantic City to fatten up that attendance.

Got the "money" and the promoter all lined up.  ;D



Got this in the player right now Danny:



Alright, I am finished with my derailment....apologies to all.
There will never be another era like the Golden Age of Hollywood.  We didn't know how to blow up buildings then so we had no choice but to tell great stories with great characters.-Ben Mankiewicz

rappy

Well... I think Prokofiev had great melodical inspiration. Look at the violin sonatas, symphonies (all of them! except the 4th which I don't know), violin concertos, piano concertos (1-3!!), piano sonatas 6-8 etc. etc.
Sorry, but Shosta can't beat this. Many of his works are too overblown and long for me. I prefer compact works - I don't like Mahler a lot, either, for the same reason.
I think Shostakovich is the Mahler and Prokofiev the Schubert of the 19th century.

greg

Quote from: rappy on November 24, 2007, 05:09:13 AM
Well... I think Prokofiev had great melodical inspiration. Look at the violin sonatas, symphonies (all of them! except the 4th which I don't know), violin concertos, piano concertos (1-3!!), piano sonatas 6-8 etc. etc.
Sorry, but Shosta can't beat this. Many of his works are too overblown and long for me. I prefer compact works - I don't like Mahler a lot, either, for the same reason.
I think Shostakovich is the Mahler and Prokofiev the Schubert of the 19th century.
i think you meant the "20th century"  ;)

Danny

Quote from: rappy on November 24, 2007, 05:09:13 AM
Well... I think Prokofiev had great melodical inspiration. Look at the violin sonatas, symphonies (all of them! except the 4th which I don't know), violin concertos, piano concertos (1-3!!), piano sonatas 6-8 etc. etc.
Sorry, but Shosta can't beat this. Many of his works are too overblown and long for me. I prefer compact works - I don't like Mahler a lot, either, for the same reason.
I think Shostakovich is the Mahler and Prokofiev the Schubert of the 19th century.

Unlocked the voting; make it official and let's keep adding more votes for Sergei.  ;)

rappy


greg

Quote from: Danny on November 24, 2007, 02:22:19 PM
Unlocked the voting; make it official and let's keep adding more votes for Sergei.  ;)
yeah! Serge isn't going down without a fight  $:)

Mirror Image

Shostakovich wins for me, but I really enjoy a lot of Prokofiev's music too, but Shostakovich had me hooked for many years whereas Prokofiev's is always enjoyable for me, but it doesn't send me into the kind of deep thought I seem to do with Shostakovich. The factors surrounding Shostakovich's music are also so damn fascinating. I like Shostakovich's blend of styles, his sarcasm, and the biting humor of his music. He really could write in any style he wanted to and remains, for me, one of the most versatile composers of the 20th Century.

ibanezmonster

Shostakovich = my 2 favorite composers mixed together  ;D

not edward

Quote from: Greg on September 20, 2011, 07:07:58 AM
Shostakovich = my 2 favorite composers mixed together  ;D
Mahler and Mussorgsky? (I always think the Mussorgsky influence on Shostakovich is underestimated.)
"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music