The Validity of Suggestions

Started by George, December 13, 2007, 07:56:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Don

Quote from: George on December 13, 2007, 09:47:02 AM
Why isn't that enough?  :-\

Simply saying "I like this recording" IS enough, assuming the poster is satisfied with the short comment.  

Are you suggesting that a poster should pay attention to what others will think of the posting?  I believe in the individual approach to these subjects.  I post when I want, write what I want and give no attention to what other board members will think of my comments.

George

Quote from: Great Gable on December 13, 2007, 09:57:50 AM
If nothing else this thread must win the "hot topic of the day" award. It certainly has evoked some interest.

I was just thinking of how proud I am. My first topic in over a month and it's caught on like wildfire!!

Don

Quote from: MN Dave on December 13, 2007, 09:50:19 AM
You'd need comparison experience for a lot of that, Don.

Yes, but you don't need musical training for any of it.

George

Quote from: Don on December 13, 2007, 09:58:47 AM
Simply saying "I like this recording" IS enough, assuming the poster is satisfied with the short comment. 

Are you suggesting that a poster should pay attention to what others will think of the posting?

No, no way. I am suggesting that not posting what you think because you don't think it will be enough is terrible.

QuoteI believe in the individual approach to these subjects.  I post when I want, write what I want and give no attention to what other board members will think of my comments.

That's one thing that I respect about you, even if at times I have had difficulty with it.  :)


Don

Quote from: Harry on December 13, 2007, 09:52:41 AM
So short and concise reviews are worthless, allthough someone has listen a dozen times.
For the record, I post mostly after five or six times, and even than I wait longer before I post.
So longer post are not necessarily more informed as short ones.

Harry,

You're just a concise writer - I appreciate that.

Don

Quote from: George on December 13, 2007, 09:54:17 AM
When someone asks me my opinion, they can't expect more than what I can give them. This hold true for how much or how little I can give.


Actually, they can expect anything they want.  But you can't give them more than what you have to offer.  This is a one-way street.

MN Dave

Quote from: George on December 13, 2007, 09:57:04 AM
Sure, but  all ignore them (and to me, that includes just folks in a bad mood) then what you have is one disgruntled user, rather than two/three/twenty people fighting/bickering.

IF!

Don

Quote from: George on December 13, 2007, 10:01:43 AM

That's one thing that I respect about you, even if at times I have had difficulty with it.  :)


Well, I would like to always be polite and understanding.  But like all humans, I have my "hot buttons" that sometimes color my responses.

Josquin des Prez

#108
Quote from: Great Gable on December 13, 2007, 09:43:30 AM
although the complete absence of any musical training does limit my perceptions.

Not sure while would this be a problem. Music exists in sounds, not in theory, therefore having any real knowledge of the latter doesn't guarantee true understanding of the first. They are complete separate entities.

I don't know the single speck of music theory and yet i had an extended argument once with somebody who simply couldn't wrap his head around Bach. He would bring up scores (which i could not read), and i had to answer with concrete musical samples (which he couldn't understand). Eventually he got the idea but it was a frustrating process, also because he kept doubting my words on account of my theoretical vacuum. Parroting things you memorized form a book just isn't knowledge.

Don

Quote from: George on December 13, 2007, 10:01:43 AM
No, no way. I am suggesting that not posting what you think because you don't think it will be enough is terrible.


A little courage is needed in the above situation, but just a little.

Great Gable

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on December 13, 2007, 10:12:15 AM
Not sure while would this be a problem. Music exists in sounds, not in theory, therefore having any real knowledge of the latter doesn't guarantee true understanding of the first. They are complete separate entities.

I don't know the single speck of music theory and yet i had an extended argument once with somebody who simply couldn't wrap his head around Bach. He would bring up scores (which i could not read), and i had to answer with concrete musical samples (which he couldn't understand). Eventually he got the idea but it was a frustrating process, also because he kept doubting my words on account of my theoretical vacuum.
Well I feel it limits me. I don't know the correct terminology of musical structure, for example, and that, by very definition, has a knock-on effect on what I can say. It doesn't stop me from saying that I either like or dislike a piece but it stops me from giving a reasonable and exhaustive reason why I have come to my opinion. Of course that must be taken into account by both critic and reader.

Mark

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on December 13, 2007, 10:12:15 AM
Parroting things you memorized form a book just isn't knowledge.

With this I could not agree more. But don't get me started on university education ... >:(

71 dB

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on December 13, 2007, 10:12:15 AM
Music exists in sounds, not in theory, therefore having any real knowledge of the latter doesn't guarantee true understanding of the first.

I have brought this up several times. I think some musically educated people don't really understand (complex) music manifested as sounds.

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on December 13, 2007, 10:12:15 AMI don't know the single speck of music theory

Wow, I might know more than you!  ;D

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on December 13, 2007, 10:12:15 AMand yet i had an extended argument once with somebody who simply couldn't wrap his head around Bach. He would bring up scores (which i could not read), and i had to answer with concrete musical samples (which he couldn't understand). Eventually he got the idea but it was a frustrating process, also because he kept doubting my words on account of my theoretical vacuum. Parroting things you memorized form a book just isn't knowledge.

Yes. I have figured out that counterpoint is especially difficult to crasp for many.
Spatial distortion is a serious problem deteriorating headphone listening.
Crossfeeders reduce spatial distortion and make the sound more natural
and less tiresome in headphone listening.

My Sound Cloud page <-- NEW Jan. 2024 "Harpeggiator"

Josquin des Prez

Quote from: 71 dB on December 13, 2007, 10:42:32 AM
Yes. I have figured out that counterpoint is especially difficult to crasp for many.

You mean kinda like Brahms (arguably the greatest contrapuntist of his day) is dry and lacks in complexity?  ;D

Don

Quote from: 71 dB on December 13, 2007, 10:42:32 AM

Yes. I have figured out that counterpoint is especially difficult to crasp for many.

What's difficult about two or more melodies played at the same time?  All you gotta do is listen.

71 dB

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on December 13, 2007, 10:44:46 AM
You mean kinda like Brahms (arguably the greatest contrapuntist of his day) is dry and lacks in complexity?  ;D

Brahms is complex and dry.
Spatial distortion is a serious problem deteriorating headphone listening.
Crossfeeders reduce spatial distortion and make the sound more natural
and less tiresome in headphone listening.

My Sound Cloud page <-- NEW Jan. 2024 "Harpeggiator"

71 dB

Quote from: Don on December 13, 2007, 10:51:18 AM
What's difficult about two or more melodies played at the same time?  All you gotta do is listen.

Yes, but many find it difficult!
Spatial distortion is a serious problem deteriorating headphone listening.
Crossfeeders reduce spatial distortion and make the sound more natural
and less tiresome in headphone listening.

My Sound Cloud page <-- NEW Jan. 2024 "Harpeggiator"

Harry

Quote from: 71 dB on December 13, 2007, 10:56:51 AM
Brahms is complex and dry.

Complex it is my friend, but dry, no I don't think so, rather juicy I would say. ;D

MN Dave

Quote from: Harry on December 13, 2007, 11:00:02 AM
Complex it is my friend, but dry, no I don't think so, rather juicy I would say. ;D

Some of it's juicy. Some of it's dry.

Harry

Quote from: 71 dB on December 13, 2007, 10:58:41 AM
Yes, but many find it difficult!

The older you get, and the more you have listened Poju,that is instrumental in listening to 10 melodies at the same time if so needed. 8)