GMG Classical Music Forum

The Back Room => The Diner => Topic started by: Brian on February 03, 2008, 01:56:03 PM

Title: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 03, 2008, 01:56:03 PM
(http://www.beloblog.com/ProJo_Blogs/PatsBlog/archives/NewPatsLogo.jpg)

Prepare for some excellent football commercials!  :D

Can anything stop the New England Videotapes in their quest for world domination?

My prediction: well, obviously, the Patriots are going to win. They're better in every way. They'll get their perfect season and the rest of America will be hearing about it for months. The Giants really don't stand a chance. Nevertheless, because I am a sentimental idiot, I'm going to say Giants by 2 (NY 30, NE 28). This way, if I'm wrong and the Patriots win, then I'll be able to say that I knew it was going to happen, and if the Giants pull off an upset, I'll be able to say I predicted it.  ;D

This prediction is also borne out of sentimentality, an awful lot of wishful thinking, and anger at the fact that Indianapolis isn't playing. Oh wouldn't it be nice for the goofy New Yorkers to pull off the upset of the century?

What do you suppose is going to happen?

- - -

Q1 - NE 7, NYG 6
Q2 - NE 14, NYG 13
Q3 - NYG 23, NE 21
Q4 - NYG 30, NE 28 (comeback final drive capped by game-winning FG)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Haffner on February 03, 2008, 03:14:47 PM
The Jets didn't make it  :(. I'll pass.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: btpaul674 on February 03, 2008, 06:08:30 PM
hahaha giants win.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 03, 2008, 06:16:02 PM
PRESENTING THE NEW YORK GIANTS!!!!!
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Danny on February 03, 2008, 06:36:23 PM
Hooray for Eli!  Daddy now has two superbowl champs and I'm sure that makes up for his ring-less fingers! :)

0:)   0:)   0:)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: springrite on February 03, 2008, 08:09:46 PM
No LIVE coverage here in Beijing, but I guess I will see it tonight. It will be an instructional course for Vanessa and our baby on American Football. The final drive will be textbook material!
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 03, 2008, 08:26:12 PM
Quote from: springrite on February 03, 2008, 08:09:46 PM
No LIVE coverage here in Beijing, but I guess I will see it tonight. It will be an instructional course for Vanessa and our baby on American Football. The final drive will be textbook material!
The final drive gave me about 6 heart attacks.  ;D ;D That was one of the most exhilarating moments ... just ... wow ... wow.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Iago on February 03, 2008, 08:58:09 PM
I'm ecstatic that the football season is now OVER.

Since I believe that only BASEBALL deserves continuing interest (especially the NY Mets), as far as I'm concerned the baseball season has now started. It's about time.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: XB-70 Valkyrie on February 03, 2008, 09:05:10 PM
Did some grossly overpaid celebrity's titty "accidently" slip out of her bra this time?  ::)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 03, 2008, 09:16:17 PM
Quote from: Iago on February 03, 2008, 08:58:09 PM
I'm ecstatic that the football season is now OVER.

Since I believe that only BASEBALL deserves continuing interest (especially the NY Mets), as far as I'm concerned the baseball season has now started. It's about time.
NL East 2008
1. Mets (90+ wins)
2. Nationals (85ish wins)
3. Phillies (85ish wins)
4. Braves (80 wins)
5. Marlins (70 wins)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: PaulR on February 03, 2008, 09:22:18 PM
Quote from: Brian on February 03, 2008, 09:16:17 PM
NL East 2008
1. Mets (90+ wins)
2. Nationals (85ish wins)
3. Phillies (85ish wins)
4. Braves (80 wins)
5. Marlins (70 wins)
That's definitely generous standings......I don't think the Nats will have 85 wins....
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Iago on February 03, 2008, 09:24:08 PM
Quote from: Brian on February 03, 2008, 09:16:17 PM
NL East 2008
1. Mets (90+ wins)
2. Nationals (85ish wins)
3. Phillies (85ish wins)
4. Braves (80 wins)
5. Marlins (70 wins)

I agree with your prognostications for first and last place. But I also think that both the Phillies and the Braves will finish ahead of the Nationals.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 03, 2008, 09:29:37 PM
Quote from: Iago on February 03, 2008, 09:24:08 PM
I agree with your prognostications for first and last place. But I also think that both the Phillies and the Braves will finish ahead of the Nationals.
First and last are easy enough. But I think the Phils, whose additions of Jenkins, Feliz and Lidge are uninspiring to say the least, will be right in the mix with the consistently strong Braves and rising young Nationals (with a new core of hitting talent). For Washington the problem is pitching, but I think this will be a pleasant surprise indeed. As indicated my predictions for 2 and 3 could easily be switched - all three middle teams will probably finish within a handful games of each other...
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Szykneij on February 04, 2008, 02:24:41 AM
Quote from: Iago on February 03, 2008, 08:58:09 PM
I'm ecstatic that the football season is now OVER.

Since I believe that only BASEBALL deserves continuing interest (especially the NY Mets), as far as I'm concerned the baseball season has now started. It's about time.

The Mets did well by signing Santana. I wish the Red Sox had gotten him, but since they didn't, I'm glad he's now in the National League.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: PerfectWagnerite on February 04, 2008, 06:13:00 AM
The best part about the Giants' win: looking at Belaschek and Randy Moss' expressions. Two guys nobody in America can root for.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: ChamberNut on February 04, 2008, 06:27:01 AM
I was really happy to see Tom Brady face so much pressure from the swarming Giants defence.  Hmmm, Brady looks average to me when he has pressure on him.  :D

Happy for Michael Strahan.   :) 

I wanted the Giants to win, although a small part of me hoped the Pats would win so that the damn '72 Dolphins would stop sucking on champagne bottles.   ::)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: MN Dave on February 04, 2008, 06:28:50 AM
I had a great time ignoring the Stupid Super Bowl completely!  8)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Anne on February 04, 2008, 07:44:21 AM
Quote from: MN Dave on February 04, 2008, 06:28:50 AM
I had a great time ignoring the Stupid Super Bowl completely!  8)

We did too!  Played Bridge and helped the opposition make a small slam.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: BorisG on February 04, 2008, 02:35:22 PM
I was pleased the Giants slammedthe Pats.

Amongst the many awful commercials, a few stood out.

http://www.ulinkx.com/video/9640016/planters_perfume

http://www.ulinkx.com/video/9640026/bridgestone_scream_super_bowl_ad

http://www.ulinkx.com/video/9640019/bud_light_language_of_love_commercial
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Sergeant Rock on February 04, 2008, 03:27:04 PM
From the Cleveland Leader:

Gisele Bündchen Takes Back Her Promise to Run Through Manhattan Naked

Supermodel Gisele Bündchen, the girlfriend of New England Patriots' quarterback Tom Brady, had previously said, "If the Pats lose, I'll run naked through Mid-Town Manhattan."

(http://photos.imageevent.com/sgtrock/gm2/gisele.jpg)

Of course now that the Patriots have indeed lost, Gisele is trying to renege on her promise.According to CBS Sports, she's backing down not because of a fear of being naked in public, but rather, the logistics of such a stunt.

"It was a mistake and I'm sorry I said it. I don't know what I could have been thinking -- Midtown Manhattan is a parking lot any time of day or night. It'd take 30 minutes just to make it from the Theater District to 34th Street. And what if I ran into the Naked Cowboy and had to pose for pictures with every out-of-town Tom, Dick and Harry? Tack on another 30 minutes, easily. How 'bout I simply flashed my breasts from a billboard in Times Square and call it a day ... will that work?"

Remember this for the future: don't make a bet with Gisele because she doesn't pay up!

Sarge
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 04, 2008, 04:28:40 PM
What a whiner. A promise is a promise, and she should have known what she was saying when she said it.

That said, a well-lit block or two would be fine.  ;D
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: TheGSMoeller on February 02, 2014, 08:10:45 AM
Who ya got?
Hawks or Broncos?  8)

Me: Broncos - 31, Seahawks - 17
My four year old son: Seahawks - 12, Broncos - 7 (he just likes the Seahawks logo better, but he's adamant about them winning.)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 02, 2014, 08:12:46 AM
I'm pulling for the Seahawks, which is the underdog team here for sure as this is the second time they've been to the Super Bowl. Plus, I just want to see Peyton Manning cry like a baby if they lose. :)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Peter on February 02, 2014, 04:17:43 PM
This game depresses me.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 02, 2014, 04:30:14 PM
Quote from: Peter on February 02, 2014, 04:17:43 PM
This game depresses me.

Not me. I'll only be depressed if Denver wins. 8)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 02, 2014, 05:28:24 PM
This is the worst Super Bowl I've ever seen. There are no G-rated words for how bad this Super Bowl is.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: TheGSMoeller on February 02, 2014, 05:36:57 PM
I haven't watched a play in the second half. All I know is that at least my NY Jets didn't embarrass themselves at this Super Bowl like this.  ;D
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 02, 2014, 06:11:44 PM
Quote from: Brian on February 02, 2014, 05:28:24 PM
This is the worst Super Bowl I've ever seen. There are no G-rated words for how bad this Super Bowl is.

Why because your team lost? Lol...

I LOVED this game and laughed at how many touchdowns Denver gave Seattle. Denver played horribly and I loved every minute of it!
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 02, 2014, 06:17:27 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on February 02, 2014, 06:11:44 PM
Why because your team lost? Lol...

I LOVED this game and laughed at how many touchdowns Denver gave Seattle. Denver played horribly and I loved every minute of it!

I'm not a football fan. This was a shitty game. The first quarter was amusingly weird, but after that it was boring, lopsided, and pointless. Not even the touchdowns were interesting, except Percy Harvin's electric return. The highlight was the botched initial coin toss. And I really don't understand your antagonism toward the smartest, best quarterback of all time (even though he didn't look even halfway decent tonight).
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 02, 2014, 06:21:17 PM
Quote from: Brian on February 02, 2014, 06:17:27 PM
I'm not a football fan. This was a shitty game. The first quarter was amusingly weird, but after that it was boring, lopsided, and pointless. And I really don't understand your antagonism toward the smartest, best quarterback of all time (even though he didn't look even halfway decent tonight).

I just don't like Manning. I saw a pre-game interview with and he was cocky as hell. I loved every minute of the game because Denver lost and were playing some horrible football. I'd be embarrassed too. I'll always root for the underdog team and all the odds were against Seattle tonight and I'm just glad things went in their favor. They deserved it.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 02, 2014, 06:24:39 PM
But the highlight of the night for me wasn't even the game, it was watching the game with my dad. We're both not big sports fans but, again, it's the whole underdog scenario that we love.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 02, 2014, 06:45:18 PM
BTW, it was a boring game because Denver weren't even playing at their usual high standard, which really doesn't make for anything entertaining. One of the most important lessons here is one team should never underestimate the other team. Both teams were excellent or they wouldn't be in the Super Bowl. I just don't think Denver where in the right frame of mind the whole night.

Also, those commercials were just lame. I mean really, really lame. The best one, for me, was U2 and that's just because I like their music. 8) Oh and I muted the half-time show. Absolutely pathetic, but most half-time shows are anyway.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 02, 2014, 07:19:47 PM
Actually, I liked Bruno Mars at the halftime show. Good show, not bad songs. (Although I think I heard a lyric that sounded like, "I'll always think you're pretty cuz you're amazing," which reminded me of my general policy to never, ever listen to the lyrics of pop songs I enjoy.) My favorite part of the whole thing was the botched coin flip at the start - hilarious.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 02, 2014, 07:28:31 PM
I missed the 'botched' coin toss, but it doesn't matter to me anymore. The Super Bowl is over with and so I'm done. Now, back to my regularly scheduled programming.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Cato on February 03, 2014, 08:48:11 AM
Denver's performance apparently shows the dangers of Colorado's flirtation with legalizing marijuana.   8) 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Karl Henning on February 03, 2014, 08:53:26 AM
Such a big bowl, there may still be a good bud or two in there . . . .
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Beale on February 03, 2014, 08:55:07 AM
The highlight for me was Renee Fleming's rendition of the Star Spangled Banner.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Karl Henning on February 03, 2014, 08:56:57 AM
I cannot have an opinion: I watched Dr Strangelove, and then the Life of Brian.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Gurn Blanston on February 03, 2014, 09:06:02 AM
Quote from: Beale on February 03, 2014, 08:55:07 AM
The highlight for me was Renee Fleming's rendition of the Star Spangled Banner.

It was very good. Parts which have normally programmed singers busting out of their girdles she simply tossed off with no effort at all. Now, that's a 'diva'. :)

8)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: TheGSMoeller on February 03, 2014, 09:28:37 AM
Quote from: karlhenning on February 03, 2014, 08:56:57 AM
I cannot have an opinion: I watched Dr Strangelove, and then the Life of Brian.

You sir, made a much wiser choice than some of us did.
As for Bronco fans, always look on the bright side of life (whistling)  :P
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Karl Henning on February 03, 2014, 10:10:42 AM
Did you say, "ex-leper"?
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 03, 2014, 05:37:59 PM
Quote from: Cato on February 03, 2014, 08:48:11 AM
Denver's performance apparently shows the dangers of Colorado's flirtation with legalizing marijuana.   8) 8) 8) 8)

:P
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: snyprrr on February 06, 2014, 06:58:28 AM
What do you know about foorball being classed as "Entertainment" rather than as "Sport"? If it were a Sport, wouldn't the 32 franchises act individually... but, the act as one cyclopean entity.

Super Bowl = Superb Owl (it IS masonic after all, hidden in plain sight) boheimian groove (das grosse owl)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Gurn Blanston on February 06, 2014, 08:36:35 AM
Quote from: snyprrr on February 06, 2014, 06:58:28 AM
What do you know about foorball being classed as "Entertainment" rather than as "Sport"? If it were a Sport, wouldn't the 32 franchises act individually... but, the act as one cyclopean entity.

Super Bowl = Superb Owl (it IS masonic after all, hidden in plain sight) boheimian groove (das grosse owl)

All sports are entertainment, even if only for the participants. I wouldn't want to make assumptions about the 'realness' of anything I see on TV, but I think you are confusing football with pro wrestling.... :)

8)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Szykneij on February 06, 2014, 12:36:40 PM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on February 06, 2014, 08:36:35 AM
All sports are entertainment, even if only for the participants. I wouldn't want to make assumptions about the 'realness' of anything I see on TV, but I think you are confusing football with pro wrestling.... :)

... or the NBA.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: springrite on February 06, 2014, 02:05:23 PM
Quote from: karlhenning on February 03, 2014, 08:56:57 AM
I cannot have an opinion: I watched Dr Strangelove, and then the Life of Brian.


Instead of Life of Peyton...

Glad I missed the game. I was at the beach with Kimi instead.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: snyprrr on February 07, 2014, 09:38:34 AM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on February 06, 2014, 08:36:35 AM
All sports are entertainment, even if only for the participants. I wouldn't want to make assumptions about the 'realness' of anything I see on TV, but I think you are confusing football with pro wrestling.... :)

8)

I don't think so. Apparently NFL is CLASSIFIED (by whom? uh) as 'Entertainment' or 'Sports Entertainment' just like WWF. That's what was asserted by whoever it was that was trolling somewhere earlier why you ask me all these questions anyway!?!

Quote from: Szykneij on February 06, 2014, 12:36:40 PM
... or the NBA.

and yes, they showed a video with a Kobe game where the refs were just obvious... I wonder if the realness of these things is a RELIGION to some and that's why no one dare call it rigged because then their whole apple pie 401K goes down the toilet? I still think Superb Owl is more than just an unexpected look-see.

Just better hope you're betting on whomever the controllers are for!

As acrobatics, pro wrestling is real. Maybe as a grand deception football is real? Surely the whole juiciness of it all is that only a few people need be involved... "should we do it with the quarterback, or with the sideline ref or the kicker?" "soooo, you love your wife at home doncha? well, we need you..."

Oh, that's right, this is a mozart music forum, those things only happen in red states! :laugh:


I mean, people aren't here, it's their religion. Everyone wears the saaame colors all the time here.

Modern reality has been written by people like Ben Shahn. Bread and circuses. What would happen to America if their god was unmasked?
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: The Six on February 07, 2014, 09:48:43 AM
Quote from: snyprrr on February 07, 2014, 09:38:34 AM
and yes, they showed a video with a Kobe game where the refs were just obvious... I wonder if the realness of these things is a RELIGION to some and that's why no one dare call it rigged because then their whole apple pie 401K goes down the toilet? I still think Superb Owl is more than just an unexpected look-see.

Just better hope you're betting on whomever the controllers are for!

As acrobatics, pro wrestling is real. Maybe as a grand deception football is real? Surely the whole juiciness of it all is that only a few people need be involved... "should we do it with the quarterback, or with the sideline ref or the kicker?" "soooo, you love your wife at home doncha? well, we need you..."

Oh, that's right, this is a mozart music forum, those things only happen in red states! :laugh:


I mean, people aren't here, it's their religion. Everyone wears the saaame colors all the time here.

Modern reality has been written by people like Ben Shahn. Bread and circuses. What would happen to America if their god was unmasked?

Can someone translate?
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Sammy on February 07, 2014, 12:50:08 PM
I enjoyed the game.  It's always a pleasure to watch an exceptional team (Seattle) do its thing.  As for Denver, they were very entertaining with all their goofs.

Although both teams reside in the two States that have legalized recreational sale/use of pot, it might have been only the Denver players who stoked up before the game.  It sure looked like Denver's center didn't know what was going on.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 07, 2014, 05:27:35 PM
Quote from: Sammy on February 07, 2014, 12:50:08 PM
I enjoyed the game.  It's always a pleasure to watch an exceptional team (Seattle) do its thing.  As for Denver, they were very entertaining with all their goofs.

Although both teams reside in the two States that have legalized recreational sale/use of pot, it might have been only the Denver players who stoked up before the game.  It sure looked like Denver's center didn't know what was going on.

I enjoyed the game, too. I loved watching Seattle's unstoppable defense.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: kishnevi on February 07, 2014, 05:50:50 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on February 07, 2014, 05:27:35 PM
I enjoyed the game, too. I loved watching Seattle's unstoppable defense.

Terminology question:  shouldn't offenses be unstoppable, and defenses stop-everything.

I confess I didn't watch this one, like I didn't watch every other SuperBowl.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 07, 2014, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Jeffrey Smith on February 07, 2014, 05:50:50 PM
Terminology question:  shouldn't offenses be unstoppable, and defenses stop-everything.

I confess I didn't watch this one, like I didn't watch every other SuperBowl.

That's true. :) I meant to say unflappable. That's a better adjective. ;D I'm not a football fan, but I did enjoy watching this one because I thought Seattle were the underdogs.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 07, 2016, 08:13:29 PM
Well, I was certainly glad to see the Broncos clean Panthers' clocks for Super Bowl L. Peyton Manning's last game I'm sure. The Panthers were really sore losers post-game. I believe Cam Newton even walked out of a press conference. Is this the way the MVP is supposed act? Anyway, a great game and there's one thing that Panthers continued to do throughout the night that cost them the game: they underestimated the Broncos' defense.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brahmsian on February 08, 2016, 06:03:03 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on February 07, 2016, 08:13:29 PM
Well, I was certainly glad to see the Broncos clean Panthers' clocks for Super Bowl L. Peyton Manning's last game I'm sure. The Panthers were really sore losers post-game. I believe Cam Newton even walked out of a press conference. Is this the way the MVP is supposed act? Anyway, a great game and there's one thing that Panthers continued to do throughout the night that cost them the game: they underestimated the Broncos' defense.

That Bronco defense was amazing, not only in the Super Bowl, but in the AFC Championship game against the Patriots.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 08, 2016, 07:18:23 AM
Quote from: ChamberNut on February 08, 2016, 06:03:03 AM
That Bronco defense was amazing, not only in the Super Bowl, but in the AFC Championship game against the Patriots.

Yes! The Broncos defense won that game for them as far as I'm concerned. Manning played decent, but well enough to make some good passes. Loved watching the cocky Panthers go home. They really were some sore losers as their quarterback Cam Newton got up in the middle of an interview and walked out. Yeah, really fine way for the league's MVP to act.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 08, 2016, 07:22:03 AM
Boring game with sloppy play. Incredible defense, certainly, but not very fun to watch in general. Commercials were not that good. Bruno Mars and Beyonce saved the tepid Coldplay show. Lady Gaga absolutely knocked the anthem out of the park, though.

Overall D+.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 08, 2016, 07:30:09 AM
Quote from: Brian on February 08, 2016, 07:22:03 AM
Boring game with sloppy play. Incredible defense, certainly, but not very fun to watch in general. Commercials were not that good. Bruno Mars and Beyonce saved the tepid Coldplay show. Lady Gaga absolutely knocked the anthem out of the park, though.

Overall D+.

I thought it was a great game actually and the halftime show was god-awful. Lady Gaga also was equally horrible.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 08, 2016, 07:42:43 AM
Wow, no. Lady G was the best part of the whole night.

The best part of the halftime show? All the superstars dancing together at the end and Gustavo Dudamel jumping up and down behind them, like a big dork, secretly wishing he was famous enough to join them.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 08, 2016, 12:27:23 PM
Quote from: Brian on February 08, 2016, 07:42:43 AM
Wow, no. Lady G was the best part of the whole night.

The best part of the halftime show? All the superstars dancing together at the end and Gustavo Dudamel jumping up and down behind them, like a big dork, secretly wishing he was famous enough to join them.

Well, it's all really subjective, Brian, isn't it? I never have liked Lady Gaga and thought her performance wasn't up to snuff. The best part of the night for me was watching the Panthers go home.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Gurn Blanston on February 08, 2016, 01:06:32 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on February 08, 2016, 07:30:09 AM
I thought it was a great game actually and the halftime show was god-awful. Lady Gaga also was equally horrible.

You must not be a fan of singing, John. Thousands aren't, no shame in it. I never thought I would actually say something nice about anyone who calls herself Gaga, but her voice is tremendous (last year at the Oscars, she equaled Julie Andrews in the Sound of Music bit). She did better with the Anthem than almost anyone I have ever heard do it, and at 64 years old, I have heard a few! She could have made it easily as a serious vocalist, maybe she just realized the money was in pop, I don't know... :-\

8)

Quote from: Mirror Image on February 08, 2016, 12:27:23 PM
Well, it's all really subjective, Brian, isn't it? I never have liked Lady Gaga and thought her performance wasn't up to snuff. The best part of the night for me was watching the Panthers go home.

No it's not. Your reaction may be subjective, but the fact that she was brilliant is anything but.

FWIW, I was pleased to see the Panthers get sent to the house too. Even if they are back next year, Peyton will be gone, they can have what's left after that.   :)

8)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 08, 2016, 01:20:01 PM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on February 08, 2016, 01:06:32 PM
You must not be a fan of singing, John. Thousands aren't, no shame in it. I never thought I would actually say something nice about anyone who calls herself Gaga, but her voice is tremendous (last year at the Oscars, she equaled Julie Andrews in the Sound of Music bit). She did better with the Anthem than almost anyone I have ever heard do it, and at 64 years old, I have heard a few! She could have made it easily as a serious vocalist, maybe she just realized the money was in pop, I don't know... :-\

8)

No it's not. Your reaction may be subjective, but the fact that she was brilliant is anything but.

FWIW, I was pleased to see the Panthers get sent to the house too. Even if they are back next year, Peyton will be gone, they can have what's left after that.   :)

8)

One can be a fan of singing and doesn't have to like Gaga in the process of course. There are thousands of great vocalists, but this doesn't mean I like all of them. The very nature of subjectivity means that a performance or a piece of art is completely wide-open to criticism and the main one I have against her goes to the fact that I prefer to have our National Anthem sung straight without the vocal pyrotechnics, but it's not like I like our National Anthem to begin with. :) Oh, how unpatriotic of me. I'm such a commie....lol. :P
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Marsch MacFiercesome on February 08, 2016, 01:30:33 PM
(http://orig13.deviantart.net/6632/f/2012/161/7/0/lady_gaga___lovegame_cd_cover_by_gaganthony-d52z6u4.png)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RNUN8ujsI0

Out of Lady Gaga's entire oeuvre (if I may call it such), I only like one song a lot: "Love Game."

It just gives you that campy 'sixteen-year-old realness going on sick-en-ing' feel. Ha.  Ha.  Ha.

I love the refrains.

She's better soap opera in this than the male soap opera known as the Super Bowl.

Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Brian on February 08, 2016, 01:37:13 PM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on February 08, 2016, 01:06:32 PM
You must not be a fan of singing, John. Thousands aren't, no shame in it. I never thought I would actually say something nice about anyone who calls herself Gaga, but her voice is tremendous (last year at the Oscars, she equaled Julie Andrews in the Sound of Music bit). She did better with the Anthem than almost anyone I have ever heard do it, and at 64 years old, I have heard a few! She could have made it easily as a serious vocalist, maybe she just realized the money was in pop, I don't know... :-\
Her collaborations with Tony Bennett seem to have produced a big effect - now Gaga has evolved into a more soulful singer, relying less on electronics and elaborate production. There's an almost jazzy or gospel quality; John probably wouldn't like to hear Nina Simone sing the anthem, either.

By the way, at my Super Bowl party, the only better anthem we could think of was Whitney Houston's. (starts after 1:00)

https://www.youtube.com/v/N_lCmBvYMRs

...but between us, I might like Gaga's better. WH's backing from the Florida Orchestra is kind of gaudy and unworthy of her voice.
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Gurn Blanston on February 08, 2016, 02:12:31 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on February 08, 2016, 01:20:01 PM
One can be a fan of singing and doesn't have to like Gaga in the process of course. There are thousands of great vocalists, but this doesn't mean I like all of them. The very nature of subjectivity means that a performance or a piece of art is completely wide-open to criticism and the main one I have against her goes to the fact that I prefer to have our National Anthem sung straight without the vocal pyrotechnics, but it's not like I like our National Anthem to begin with. :) Oh, how unpatriotic of me. I'm such a commie....lol. :P

It's OK, I don't much like it either. :)  I'm sure Pete Seeger could have written something more appropriate... ;)

What I am saying is that you liking it or not is subjective. Whether she sang it very well indeed is not subjective, it is a fact, based on the generally accepted definition of what singing well is. I know what you mean about great vocalists not doing something well, opera signing singing Lieder is a fine example of it. But in this case, I really do feel that your dislike of her (for whatever reason) is tainting your judgement. I will toss Roseanne Barr into the ring of Anthems you should deplore. :D

8)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Gurn Blanston on February 08, 2016, 02:14:18 PM
Quote from: Brian on February 08, 2016, 01:37:13 PM
Her collaborations with Tony Bennett seem to have produced a big effect - now Gaga has evolved into a more soulful singer, relying less on electronics and elaborate production. There's an almost jazzy or gospel quality; John probably wouldn't like to hear Nina Simone sing the anthem, either.

By the way, at my Super Bowl party, the only better anthem we could think of was Whitney Houston's. (starts after 1:00)

https://www.youtube.com/v/N_lCmBvYMRs

...but between us, I might like Gaga's better. WH's backing from the Florida Orchestra is kind of gaudy and unworthy of her voice.

Yup, that one had a lot going for it too. It is #1 on my list. I'm calling Gaga's top 3 though.   :)

8)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Mirror Image on February 08, 2016, 02:18:13 PM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on February 08, 2016, 02:12:31 PM
It's OK, I don't much like it either. :)  I'm sure Pete Seeger could have written something more appropriate... ;)

What I am saying is that you liking it or not is subjective. Whether she sang it very well indeed is not subjective, it is a fact, based on the generally accepted definition of what singing well is. I know what you mean about great vocalists not doing something well, opera signing singing Lieder is a fine example of it. But in this case, I really do feel that your dislike of her (for whatever reason) is tainting your judgement. I will toss Roseanne Barr into the ring of Anthems you should deplore. :D

8)

Thankfully, I don't subscribe to what universally accepting singing is nor do I remotely care. :) I can make up my own mind about whether it's good or not. My judgement is only tainted by my general dislike of 1. her own voice and 2. how she sung the Anthem. But, like I said, I don't like our National Anthem to begin with so she didn't ruin it that much for me. Roseanne Barr, however, could ruin anything. That's pretty obvious. ;)
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: Karl Henning on February 09, 2016, 05:44:34 AM
Mercy!  My favorite Super Bowl reading, I think.

Quote from: Geo. WillSuper Bowls are so august they are usually denoted with Roman numerals. This year's, however, is designated Super Bowl 50 because Super Bowl L looks weird.

Super Bowl Sunday: The day America celebrates football --- and brain damage
Title: Re: Super Bowl!
Post by: springrite on February 09, 2016, 06:05:27 AM
Vanessa got up and watched her first NFL game. For that purpose, it is an excellent game with a bit of everything and good coaching, excellent play and especially on-field decision-making by the Broncos. It took Vanessa less than half of the the first quarter to understand the game and from then on, she was a Broncos fan. She was so nervous in the fourth quarter but ecstatic in the end.

I hope she can go to a game (maybe college game) next time she's in the US.

PS: Since I left the US in 2002, in m mind I really have no place for Panthers, Jaguars, Texans... Somehow they all sound and feel so USFL or XFL...