Elliott Carter versus John Williams

Started by Homo Aestheticus, September 24, 2008, 06:34:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Whose music of these two American composers do you find more dramatic, taking the word 'dramatic' to mean stirring, exciting, exploiting every manner of expression and making a deep and cathartic impression ?

Elliott Carter
25 (71.4%)
John Williams
10 (28.6%)

Total Members Voted: 23

Schicksal

#60
Quote from: The Ardent Pelleastre on September 28, 2008, 01:27:28 PMDo you not even find this stirring and beautiful ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN7VKAyrDm0

Third-rate Holst.

But I do like some martial scores: Patton and Battle of Britain were really first rate, thouh BofB was not that good a movie.

71 dB

Quote from: The Ardent Pelleastre on September 28, 2008, 01:27:28 PM
Schicksal,

Do you not even find this stirring and beautiful ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN7VKAyrDm0

Superman isn't John Williams' best moments. In fact it's mediocre. Schicksal should hear "Stored Memories and Monica's Theme" from A.I. That's NOT pompous brassy third-rate Holst.  ;D
Spatial distortion is a serious problem deteriorating headphone listening.
Crossfeeders reduce spatial distortion and make the sound more natural
and less tiresome in headphone listening.

My Sound Cloud page <-- NEW Jan. 2024 "Harpeggiator"

Catison

Keep in mind that John Williams writes movie scores, not symphonies.  Although they use roughly the same ensemble, they shouldn't be confused as the same genre.  Being a good film composer requires a different skill set, namely the ability to generate music very quickly and reliably.  It also requires the skill to compliment moving images and not try to distract.  Film music is a very different beast.

So I say enjoy film music for what it is, not for what it isn't.
-Brett

karlhenning

Quote from: 71 dB on September 28, 2008, 01:47:02 PM
Superman isn't John Williams' best moments. In fact it's mediocre.

That's fair.

karlhenning

Quote from: Catison on September 28, 2008, 02:16:45 PM
Keep in mind that John Williams writes movie scores, not symphonies.  Although they use roughly the same ensemble, they shouldn't be confused as the same genre.  Being a good film composer requires a different skill set, namely the ability to generate music very quickly and reliably.  It also requires the skill to compliment moving images and not try to distract.  Film music is a very different beast.

So I say enjoy film music for what it is, not for what it isn't.

That's fair, too.

greg

Quote from: Szykniej on September 27, 2008, 05:09:34 PM
But clever, nonetheless.
If you've watched enough Family Guy, you'll get the reference.  8)

Mark G. Simon

Quote from: Catison on September 28, 2008, 02:16:45 PM
Keep in mind that John Williams writes movie scores, not symphonies.  Although they use roughly the same ensemble, they shouldn't be confused as the same genre.  Being a good film composer requires a different skill set, namely the ability to generate music very quickly and reliably.  It also requires the skill to compliment moving images and not try to distract.  Film music is a very different beast.

So I say enjoy film music for what it is, not for what it isn't.

Exactly. That's why it strkies me as so bizarre to be asked to compare Carter vs. John Williams. Carter vs. Vaughan Williams would be a strange enough comparison, but at least they both operate in the sphere of concert music.

Joe Barron

#67
Quote from: Mark G. Simon on September 28, 2008, 03:50:01 PMExactly. That's why it strkies me as so bizarre to be asked to compare Carter vs. John Williams. Carter vs. Vaughan Williams would be a strange enough comparison, but at least they both operate in the sphere of concert music.

Yeah, but I like both Carter and Vaughan-Williams. In any event, the 70-30 split in the poll says something interesting. Just what I can't be sure, but it was Eric who set up the contest. ;)

Homo Aestheticus


karlhenning

Doesn't matter how often you toss up that youtube link, Eric.  It just isn't as "special" for everybody else as it seems to be for you.

The Carter-enjoying musical public are not going to flock to the John Williams camp, based on Superman.

Ain't gonna happen, fella.

Joe Barron

Quote from: The Ardent Pelleastre on September 28, 2008, 04:07:56 PM
No  Superman  for you, Joe ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN7VKAyrDm0

???

Well, ya know, it's OK. It's nice. It's not bad. But it's not something I'm going to sit down and listen to in my living room when I feel like listening to something, like a Haydn string quartet or a Mozart piano concerto or a Mahler symphony or Debussy's piano music --- or Carter or Boulez or Xenakis (whose music I want to explore more). I agree with the poster who said that movie music is a different animal. If I ever see Superman again, I suppose I'll appreciate what the music does for the story. But to tell you the truth, I don't like music that I have to associate with a man in tights.

And while we're on the subject, I'm getting tired of TV shows using pop songs to set a mood --- particularly cop shows, where it appears to be de rigeur during the perp walk. Jeez, people, time between commercials is precious. Write a damn scene.

I think all right-thinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told how ordinary, decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I'm certainly not. And I'm sick and tired of being told that I am.

Homo Aestheticus

Quote from: Joe Barron on September 28, 2008, 06:24:21 PMBut it's not something I'm going to sit down and listen to in my living room

And that's  exactly  what I've been doing these past 3 or 4 days and now I can't get enough of it...  ???

It all began last Wednesday as I was searching for information on the city of Nouakchott through YouTube where there was an advert of the Superman soundtrack. The last time I listened to this music I was around 7 years old when I first saw the film in 1978... Now I am like: "Damn, this is very fine music !"

I went out to Barnes and Noble and bought the deluxe edition.   ???

How did I go from my top favorites - Wagner, Debussy, Bruckner, Schubert, Mendelssohn, Richard Strauss, Tchaikovsky and Brahms to the  Superman  soundtrack ?

Jeez, what is happening to me ?

:'(

Mark G. Simon

I continuously marvel at the elegance and aristocratic sensuality of John Williams' Superman. ;)

Joe_Campbell


Wanderer

Quote from: Joe Barron on September 28, 2008, 06:24:21 PM
Jeez, people, time between commercials is precious. Write a damn scene.

Yeah!  $:)

Quote from: Mark G. Simon on September 28, 2008, 08:04:26 PM
I continuously marvel at the elegance and aristocratic sensuality of John Williams' Superman. ;)

You forgot aesthetic radiance.

sound67

Quote from: Guido on September 25, 2008, 12:36:06 AM
Erm... They compose for two entirely different genres, for different purposes...

Exactly. Another utterly useless poll.

Thomas
"Vivaldi didn't compose 500 concertos. He composed the same concerto 500 times" - Igor Stravinsky

"Mozart is a menace to musical progress, a relic of rituals that were losing relevance in his own time and are meaningless to ours." - Norman Lebrecht

Wendell_E

"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ― Mark Twain

karlhenning

Quote from: The Ardent Pelleastre on September 28, 2008, 07:08:55 PM
And that's  exactly  what I've been doing these past 3 or 4 days and now I can't get enough of it...

Eeeewwww. I mean, that's your trip, dude.

karlhenning

Quote from: Joe Barron on September 28, 2008, 06:24:21 PM
And while we're on the subject, I'm getting tired of TV shows using pop songs to set a mood --- particularly cop shows, where it appears to be de rigeur during the perp walk. Jeez, people, time between commercials is precious. Write a damn scene.

Excellent criticism & exhortation, mon vieux.

Joe Barron

Quote from: The Ardent Pelleastre on September 28, 2008, 07:08:55 PM,
Jeez, what is happening to me ?

You've got an ear worm. It happens to the best of us, so there's no reason it shouldn't happen to you.

You describing a phenomenon I've noticed about myself when it comes to pop music. If I come across a catchy song I like a lot, I'll listen to it over and over in a brief period of time --- a couple of weeks, even a few months. Then I'll leave it and almost never go back. Classical strikes me differently: I might not listen, say, Schubert Lieder as often in a year as I once did to Talking Heads --- back in 1981, I saw Stop Making Sense four times--- but I know I'll always return to them, whereas I haven't listened to Talking Heads in years, except for the occasional burst from the radio. It's happening now with Charles Ives, whose music I hadn't listened to in a long time. After some stimulating exchanges with Guido, I've gone back to the quartets and listened to them several times in the past week or so. I've even picked up a couple of additional recordings.