What - no thread about how the moon landings were faked?

Started by bwv 1080, July 17, 2009, 08:02:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

robnewman

#80
Quote from: O Mensch on July 19, 2009, 01:26:49 PM
... E X C E P T   T H A T   T H E R E   I S   N O   A T M O S P H E R E   T O   T R A N S M I T   T H E   H E A T  ! ! !

Stop using the royal "we". You are neither royal, nor do you have any support here now that Sean has bailed on you.

QUESTION FOR O MENSCH -

Solar Radiation comes from -

a) The Moon ?
b) Pluto ?
c) Mount Everest ?
d) The Sun ?
e) Ronald McDonalds ?

And please tell us how did the Apollo crew escape being bombarded by deadly amounts of SOLAR RADIATION for days on their way to the moon, during the time they were there, and on their return back over several days to Earth.

Answers on a postcard to -

The Editor
Popular Mechanics
Spinville
c/o NASA Propaganda Department
Space Station X
Andromeda

;D ;D ;D


Brian

Quote from: Elgarian on July 19, 2009, 01:28:38 PM
Who is really writing robnewman's posts?
I think it's Joyce Hatto. Or possibly Elvis. :)

knight66

Quote from: Elgarian on July 19, 2009, 01:28:38 PM
Who is really writing robnewman's posts?

A bot, which is why questions are never answered.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

Taxes-

radiation transmits energy through vacuum. However, on the camera issue.

snyprrr

There's a funny video of the moon walk where one of the Kliegel lights crashes into the frame.

MishaK

Quote from: Elgarian on July 19, 2009, 01:28:38 PM
Who is really writing robnewman's posts?

;D

Quote from: Brian on July 19, 2009, 01:40:20 PM
I think it's Joyce Hatto. Or possibly Elvis. :)

;D

Quote from: robnewman on July 19, 2009, 01:35:39 PM

robnewman, you're in no position to make any demands. I have responded to all your nonsense above. You simply ignore it and repeat lies and ignorance, hoping Goebbels-style that repetition will make it true. You're the one who has failed to meet any evidentiary standards and provide a positive theory of the whole crime. I.e. who did it, why, how and why for f&%k's sake in over 40 years were we unable to find even one person among the thousands and thousands who must have been involved to leak even one bit of inside information, despite the fact that such leakage would have led to instant fame and wealth.

Quote from: Taxes- on July 19, 2009, 01:43:19 PM
radiation transmits energy through vacuum. However, on the camera issue.

Yes, but he keeps moving the goalposts. You can easily shield a camera from the bit of background radiation you will have on the moon. But I was responding to his claim that the film and the camera would have melted, which is nonsense. His response to that was the non sequitur about solar radiation.

robnewman

'I am safe', said the chicken, wrapping himself in aluminium foil as he entered in to the oven.

Solar Radiation is more dangerous than a hot gas oven. Right ?

So, the question remains -

What protection did the Apollo crew have to VERY INTENSE SOLAR RADIATION that exists in outer space during the Apollo mission to the moon and on their way back other than aluminium ?

Er.........../PAUSE/Cornflakes ad/PAUSE/Rustle of Papers/Another Cornflakes Ad/More Rustling of papers.....etc. etc.





Elgarian

Quote from: Brian on July 19, 2009, 01:40:20 PM
Or possibly Elvis. :)

Huh! Don't get me started. You don't believe Elvis really sang all those songs, do you?

And you do realise, I hope, that Hatto actually did play on all those recordings, but adjusted them all so that they looked like fakes when expertly analysed?

Just facts, Brian.

Elgarian

Quote from: knight on July 19, 2009, 01:40:41 PM
A bot, which is why questions are never answered.

Yes, but who is writing the script for the bot that is faking newman's posts?

knight66

DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

robnewman

Quote from: O Mensch on July 19, 2009, 01:45:51 PM
;D

;D

robnewman, you're in no position to make any demands. I have responded to all your nonsense above. You simply ignore it and repeat lies and ignorance, hoping Goebbels-style that repetition will make it true. You're the one who has failed to meet any evidentiary standards and provide a positive theory of the whole crime. I.e. who did it, why, how and why for f&%k's sake in over 40 years were we unable to find even one person among the thousands and thousands who must have been involved to leak even one bit of inside information, despite the fact that such leakage would have led to instant fame and wealth.

Yes, but he keeps moving the goalposts. You can easily shield a camera from the bit of background radiation you will have on the moon. But I was responding to his claim that the film and the camera would have melted, which is nonsense. His response to that was the non sequitur about solar radiation.

But there TWO issues you have not answered.

1. You have NOT told us how the Apollo crew withstood the constant and unbroken bombardment of solar radiation during the days to and from the Moon, have you ? That is, beyond the Van Allen Belt. Please tell us and stop delaying the reply.

2. The temperature on the Moon when the sun shines there is several hundred degrees - hot enough to fry a chicken. Right ? Hot enough to melt boots. And hot enough to require an air conditioning system which would have needed to be larger than the astronauts own size. Since the astronauts are WALKING in contact with the lunar surface are they not ? And how was this air conditing system of each astronaut powered ? How about keeping the space module cool ? It would need an enormous building of its own. Maybe it was powered by penlight batteries, right ? Or a solar generator, right ?

Gee !!!!!! ::)

MishaK

Quote from: robnewman on July 19, 2009, 01:52:50 PM
1. You have NOT told us how the Apollo crew withstood the constant and unbroken bombardment of solar radiation during the days to and from the Moon, have you ? That is, beyond the Van Allen Belt. Please tell us and stop delaying the reply.

I don't have to. The Apollo missions lasted only a few days to two weeks. Those guys were never out there long enough to absorb a meaningful dosage.

Quote from: robnewman on July 19, 2009, 01:52:50 PM
2. The temperature on the Moon when the sun shines there is several hundred degrees - hot enough to fry a chicken. Right ? Hot enough to melt boots. And hot enough to require an air conditioning system which would have needed to be larger than the astronauts own size. Since the astronauts are WALKING in contact with the lunar surface are they not ? And how was this air conditing system of each astronaut powered ? How about keeping the space module cool ? It would need an enormous building of its own. Maybe it was powered by penlight batteries, right ? Or a solar generator, right ?

For f&%k's sake! Does anything I write ever penetrate that ball of meat you wear on your shoulders? Can you please explain to the rest of us how you think that heat is transmitted from the lunar surface to the other objects in a vacuum? Never mind that all landings occurred during the lunar "morning" which lasts several days, so the temperature was nowhere near the lunar "midday" top heat.

A turnip has greater mental capacities than you! Now go wank off somewhere else if all you're gonna do is continue reproducing the same nonsense just to massage your narcissistic ego about your presumed intellectual superiority to the rest of us "sheep".

Brian

Quote from: snyprrr on July 19, 2009, 01:44:25 PM
There's a funny video of the moon walk where one of the Kliegel lights crashes into the frame.
;D ;D ;D

I'm very sorry, but I couldn't resist this.

PROOF that the moon landings were real!!!

Brian

Quote from: Elgarian on July 19, 2009, 01:46:55 PM
And you do realise, I hope, that Hatto actually did play on all those recordings, but adjusted them all so that they looked like fakes when expertly analysed?

Just facts, Brian.
*smacks forehead*

It's all so simple!!!!!!!

Taxes-

Quote from: O Mensch on July 19, 2009, 01:45:51 PM
Yes, but he keeps moving the goalposts. You can easily shield a camera from the bit of background radiation you will have on the moon.
Are you even surprised? There's no point arguing with the guy.

MishaK

Quote from: robnewman on July 19, 2009, 01:46:26 PM
'I am safe', said the chicken, wrapping himself in aluminium foil as he entered in to the oven.

No, but the tin foil hat safely protects you from all truth, evidence and logic.

bwv 1080

and to think I launched this thread to really focus on the anniversary of Apollo 11, thinking that there could not possibly be anyone stupid enough here to really believe in the faked moon landing conspiracy theories.

So fuck you Newman - you are a petty, worthless loser - nothing you or your ilk can come up with can tarnish the accomplishment that so many devoted and risked their lives for






karlhenning

Quote from: robnewman on July 19, 2009, 12:28:01 PM
One thing is quite certain - it was not William Shakespeare of Stratford on Avon.

One thing is quite certain - no one here invests your opinion on such a question with even the least weight.

Check the olive oil!

Szykneij

Quote from: Elgarian on July 19, 2009, 01:46:55 PM
Huh! Don't get me started. You don't believe Elvis really sang all those songs, do you?

Elvis is not dead.



He just went home.
Men profess to be lovers of music, but for the most part they give no evidence in their opinions and lives that they have heard it.  ~ Henry David Thoreau

Don't pray when it rains if you don't pray when the sun shines. ~ Satchel Paige

Brian