Soprano Warbling

Started by mahler10th, March 09, 2011, 08:52:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mahler10th

I've never made a secret of not liking vibrato, or excessive amounts of it, in the human voice as an art form.  One of the reasons Pavarotti was so esteemed was because his voice and high C's were clear and direct, little warbling (if any) in most cases.  Similarly, Del Monacos voice, whilst there is some warbling, presents with an airful of dramatic timbre, so one doesn't mind if he warbles or not (preferably not) :P.  These are just two illustrations of what I like in the voice, even though most times I haven't a clue what they're singing about.
In the female Soprano, it amazes me how many warblers there are.  I was investigating links to the end of "Sapho" in another thread, but each Soprano I heard warbled, including such antics as part of their art.  My point is, I would like to hear Sopranos with more of a crystal clear and direct timbre, a kind of sky blue clear Nordic sound, rather than flaunt the limitations and imperfections of their considerable throats.   :-X

mc ukrneal

Quote from: John of Glasgow on March 09, 2011, 08:52:11 PM
I've never made a secret of not liking vibrato, or excessive amounts of it, in the human voice as an art form.  One of the reasons Pavarotti was so esteemed was because his voice and high C's were clear and direct, little warbling (if any) in most cases.  Similarly, Del Monacos voice, whilst there is some warbling, presents with an airful of dramatic timbre, so one doesn't mind if he warbles or not (preferably not) :P.  These are just two illustrations of what I like in the voice, even though most times I haven't a clue what they're singing about.
In the female Soprano, it amazes me how many warblers there are.  I was investigating links to the end of "Sapho" in another thread, but each Soprano I heard warbled, including such antics as part of their art.  My point is, I would like to hear Sopranos with more of a crystal clear and direct timbre, a kind of sky blue clear Nordic sound, rather than flaunt the limitations and imperfections of their considerable throats.   :-X
You are talking about vibrato (or excessie vibrato in this case)?
Be kind to your fellow posters!!

mahler10th

Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 09, 2011, 10:17:46 PM
You are talking about vibrato (or excessie vibrato in this case)?

QuoteI've never made a secret of not liking vibrato, or excessive amounts of it...

mc ukrneal

Ha! I still must be sleeping to have read so inattentively.

I tend to agree with you. I dislike excessive vibato. And usually I prefer little to no vibrato myself. However, I do find that with French opera I do like more vibrato than I do with other nationalities (of opera). Odd that, but then they did have some different traditions as regards vibrato. But the use of vibrato is still somewhat controversial anyway. I would prefer less myself, though good singing is good singing.

The problem is worsened when some sopranos age too, so that while they may have been tolerable when young, their voice creates a beat or worse when they get older.

Be kind to your fellow posters!!

Willoughby earl of Itacarius

For me is quite easy. vibrato is not written in the score, and should not be there, apart from the natural vibrato, which amounts almost to nothing. Vibrato with soprano's is a sign that their voice is crap. And please before ya all attack me, it is my personal opinion, and I am allowed to have that. ;D

PaulSC

Musik ist ein unerschöpfliches Meer. — Joseph Riepel

petrarch

Quote from: PaulSC on March 09, 2011, 11:46:41 PM
How about violin warbling?

http://www.youtube.com/v/ICp-1YLKegM

Similarly awful. That's why one of the indications I most enjoy reading in scores (typically of 20th C music) is senza vibrato sempre ;).
//p
The music collection.
The hi-fi system: Esoteric X-03SE -> Pathos Logos -> Analysis Audio Amphitryon.
A view of the whole

Guido

Quote from: Harry IIyich Tchaikovsky on March 09, 2011, 11:07:43 PM
For me is quite easy. vibrato is not written in the score, and should not be there, apart from the natural vibrato, which amounts almost to nothing. Vibrato with soprano's is a sign that their voice is crap. And please before ya all attack me, it is my personal opinion, and I am allowed to have that. ;D

Erm.... Breathing is usually not marked in the score, but singers are still expected to do that. If you actually read what old composers said you would see that they did want vibrato.
Geologist.

The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away

mc ukrneal

Quote from: Guido. on March 10, 2011, 06:16:33 AM
Erm.... Breathing is usually not marked in the score, but singers are still expected to do that. If you actually read what old composers said you would see that they did want vibrato.
Actually, there is a lot of disagreement on whether they did or did not want it and to what extent they wanted it. In some circles it is an explosive subject.
Be kind to your fellow posters!!

MishaK

Quote from: John of Glasgow on March 09, 2011, 08:52:11 PM
I've never made a secret of not liking vibrato, or excessive amounts of it, in the human voice as an art form.  One of the reasons Pavarotti was so esteemed was because his voice and high C's were clear and direct, little warbling (if any) in most cases.  Similarly, Del Monacos voice, whilst there is some warbling, presents with an airful of dramatic timbre, so one doesn't mind if he warbles or not (preferably not) :P.  These are just two illustrations of what I like in the voice, even though most times I haven't a clue what they're singing about.
In the female Soprano, it amazes me how many warblers there are.  I was investigating links to the end of "Sapho" in another thread, but each Soprano I heard warbled, including such antics as part of their art.  My point is, I would like to hear Sopranos with more of a crystal clear and direct timbre, a kind of sky blue clear Nordic sound, rather than flaunt the limitations and imperfections of their considerable throats.   :-X

Try Gundula Janowitz. Angelic, pure, you'll love her. Her Strauss Four Last Songs with Karajan are at the top of my desert island list.

Guido

Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 10, 2011, 09:53:18 AM
Actually, there is a lot of disagreement on whether they did or did not want it and to what extent they wanted it. In some circles it is an explosive subject.

I'm talking about Verdi and Wagner and Massenet and Strauss - recordings of people who sung for these guys were made early last century and there's no one who didn't use vibrato. For Baroque singing there is more debate.
Geologist.

The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away

mahler10th

Quote from: MishaK on March 10, 2011, 09:58:10 AM
Try Gundula Janowitz. Angelic, pure, you'll love her. Her Strauss Four Last Songs with Karajan are at the top of my desert island list.

I will do.  Nice clear sopranos are so hard to find.

springrite

For ages, Scotto has been the worst offender. I simply can not stand it. An otherwise wonderful production of Francesca da Rimini (Zandonai) was almost ruined by her presence!

Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

Guido

Is she still singing? What roles? Where?
Geologist.

The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away

Wendell_E

Quote from: Guido. on March 12, 2011, 02:44:30 AM
Is she still singing? What roles? Where?

According to wikipedia (I know, I know) her last stage performance was in 2002, and the last few years were mostly devoted to Mödlrollen.  For many years she was virtually "Queen of the Met", but she last sang there in January 1987.

The high notes could be a trial (one critic called them "paint-stripping"), but I thought her intensity and musicality more than made up for it.  I think the Met Francesca da Rimini DVD is wonderful.
"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ― Mark Twain

knight66

Quote from: MishaK on March 10, 2011, 09:58:10 AM
Try Gundula Janowitz. Angelic, pure, you'll love her. Her Strauss Four Last Songs with Karajan are at the top of my desert island list.

A favourite of mine also. But she uses vibrato. Compare her vocal production to that of a boy soprano.

Now here is a vibrato and a half.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d8bF9JMznk

Now for Janowitz, even on her second note, there is vibrato. A certain amount of it is needed to provide colour to the sound.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJBymXyP1g0&feature=related

Boy soprano in Faure Requiem, lovely in its way, but pretty unformed in terms of controlling sound and the actual sound itself is pure, but lacking expression or warmth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6ePmrZDTfw

Also, I can't tell one of these lads from another. It is almost a generic sound, with the occasional distinctive voice briefly shining.

Mike

DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

knight66

Quote from: springrite on March 11, 2011, 08:00:43 PM
For ages, Scotto has been the worst offender. I simply can not stand it. An otherwise wonderful production of Francesca da Rimini (Zandonai) was almost ruined by her presence!

The only time I heard Scotto live would have been around 1972 and I have not deliberately listeded to her since. It was an entire evening of paintstripping.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

mahler10th

Quote from: knight66 on March 12, 2011, 03:26:33 AM
A favourite of mine also. But she uses vibrato. Compare her vocal production to that of a boy soprano.
Mike
Yes.  She warbles too.  Clarity can be colourful without warbling.  The venerable Pavarotti was famous for it.

Guido

Quote from: knight66 on March 12, 2011, 03:30:38 AM
The only time I heard Scotto live would have been around 1972 and I have not deliberately listeded to her since. It was an entire evening of paintstripping.

Mike

I'm a bit mystified by this. I like what I've heard of hers. Surely the intensity is compelling? It's by no means an ugly voice, often very beautiful I think. Haven't heard any bad top notes from hers in recordings either.

Interesting that the Met has its "queens" (the ones on stage, not in the audience, definitely also a major feature of that house! http://parterre.com/ ). Currently it's obviously Renée Fleming. Who was it before her?
Geologist.

The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away

Wendell_E

Quote from: Guido. on March 12, 2011, 05:22:10 AM
Interesting that the Met has its "queens" (the ones on stage, not in the audience, definitely also a major feature of that house! http://parterre.com/ ). Currently it's obviously Renée Fleming. Who was it before her?

I think the heir apparent was Aprile Millo, but that didn't quite work out.  Jessye Norman? Or Pavarotti?  Battle thought she was, but I don't think soubrette queens are allowed.
"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ― Mark Twain