My Art thread

Started by Saul, May 08, 2008, 10:02:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Brian

Quote from: Saul on June 07, 2008, 09:24:44 PM
Hi Brian,

Your above doodle is a poop too.

So , what do we have here?

A poop drawing and a poop person(m the schmuck)
That is correct, there is indeed a poop in my drawing.

And M is also correct, there are many serious threads on this forum about music, but you do not participate in them.

Those who do participate get a gold star poop!


M forever

Quote from: Brian on June 07, 2008, 09:45:10 PM
And M is also correct, there are many serious threads on this forum about music, but you do not participate in them.

I wonder why?  ::)



Quote from: Brian on June 07, 2008, 09:15:23 PM


(click for full size)

This is a very daring freestyle piece, combining naturalism and calligraphy, with a very thin subtext of psychedelic influences.

Saul

Quote from: M forever on June 07, 2008, 09:42:32 PM
Looks like Saul got really pooped out here!  ;D >:D $:) 8) :D ;) 0:)



Respect - for you? Hahaha, that's 2 funny. Good one, really. I give you 6.7 for that line!



Oh, there are *lots* of serious threads, about music, about composers, about recordings, about other subjects such as movies, history, politics - it's just that *you* can't really contribute anything to any of these because you generally don't have much to say that could be of interest for a grownup person. All you ever contribute here is, in your own vocabulary, poop talk.



That's right, everyone else here is an idiot, while you are the misunderstood ambassador of fine art and metaphysical insights. There is really no reason for you to participate here. But please, don't leave - you are just too poopy, uh, I mean, too funny!


Youre whole life is one big poop.

So lets sum it up:

You are a poop

Living in your poop life

With your poop girlfriend

Eating the poop that she cooks

Comes out to be

Poop eating poop in his poopy poopful pooplife.

Me wonders why should I converse with someone so sick and dumb as you M?

Yes , youre right, there is no reason for me to pay any attention to a schmuck like you.

So clean your stuffy poopy ears :

I will not talk to you or respond to you or read anything you have to say here or anywhere else. From now own , you do not exist for me.

Go to hell and stay there, thats where a poophead such as your stupid self belongs.



Varg

Reading Saul's posts makes me want to beat the shit out of somebody  >:(

Joe_Campbell

His posts look to me like an extremely vulgar diatrab with all bad words replaced with 'poop.' At least, that's the only way I can justify its continued usage.

mn dave


(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: Saul on June 08, 2008, 12:44:49 AM

Youre whole life is one big poop.

So lets sum it up:

You are a poop

Living in your poop life

With your poop girlfriend

Eating the poop that she cooks

Comes out to be

Poop eating poop in his poopy poopful pooplife.

Me wonders why should I converse with someone so sick and dumb as you M?

Yes , youre right, there is no reason for me to pay any attention to a schmuck like you.

So clean your stuffy poopy ears :

I will not talk to you or respond to you or read anything you have to say here or anywhere else. From now own , you do not exist for me.

Go to hell and stay there, thats where a poophead such as your stupid self belongs.




Why Saul, what if the rabbi of your congregation knew you were writing such things on the Internet? Would he say this is the conduct of a righteous Jew, a mensch? I would suspect instead he'd smack your tukkus until it was bright red for treating others so disrespectfully.
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

Lethevich

If only people could be temporarily banned as a warning against gross immaturity. Oh shit, then I'd be gone... 0:)
Peanut butter, flour and sugar do not make cookies. They make FIRE.

uffeviking

#168
Yes, people could be banned, their posts edited or removed, the entire subject be blocked, or even removed. I pondered all those possibilities after having read everyone of them - oh the pleasure of being a moderator!  ::) - and decided to leave all the exchanges intact for everybody else to read the exhibition of immaturity, rudeness and lack of civility displayed by the posters. I am an optimist and hope it will be a lesson and the perpetrators will spare us future evidence of their low respect for and tolerance of their fellow GMG members.

uffeviking $:)

M forever

That's why I have said many times before that you are totally unqualified to be a moderator. You often don't get at all what's going on and many times, you delete the wrong posts when people complain. You also don't get that in this thread, Saul is the only one who oversteps from *teasing* other people which we do a lot here (like grownups often do) to direct, ultraprimitive insults.

I got banned once for attacking Saul in a much milder form.

I think he should get banned now.

Who else thinks so?

mn dave

Quote from: M forever on June 08, 2008, 10:12:06 AM
That;s why I have said many times before that you are totally unqualified to be a moderator. You often don't get at all what's going on and many times, you delete the wrong posts when people complain. You also don't get that in this thread, Saul is the only one who oversteps from teasing other people which we do a lot here (like grownups often do) to direct, ultraprimitive insults.

I got banned once for attacking Saul in a much milder form.

I think he should get banned now.

Who else thinks so?


Well, if anyone should be banned it should be me Saul.

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: M forever on June 08, 2008, 10:12:06 AM
That's why I have said many times before that you are totally unqualified to be a moderator. You often don't get at all what's going on and many times, you delete the wrong posts when people complain. You also don't get that in this thread, Saul is the only one who oversteps from *teasing* other people which we do a lot here (like grownups often do) to direct, ultraprimitive insults.

I got banned once for attacking Saul in a much milder form.

I think he should get banned now.

Who else thinks so?


Well, this is not a democratic republic, so we won't be having a poll. FWIW, my take on Saul is that he simply loves being abused, and throws out "abuse me" lures on a regular basis. And most of the  "far-more intelligent" people here don't seem to have the wit to toss the bait, but rather, they swallow it down every time. I highly doubt that a character such as Saul could tolerate being ignored, which is what most of his postings deserve. If you really wanted to send him off, he would soon be bored with being ignored and leave on his own.

Meanwhile, all this poop stuff is just crap. Let's quit that, shall we? :)

8)


----------------
Listening to:
Lafayette Quartet / Kubalek - Dvorak Quintet in A for Piano & Srings No 2 Op 81 1st mvmt
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

Saul

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on June 08, 2008, 10:27:40 AM
Well, this is not a democratic republic, so we won't be having a poll. FWIW, my take on Saul is that he simply loves being abused, and throws out "abuse me" lures on a regular basis. And most of the  "far-more intelligent" people here don't seem to have the wit to toss the bait, but rather, they swallow it down every time. I highly doubt that a character such as Saul could tolerate being ignored, which is what most of his postings deserve. If you really wanted to send him off, he would soon be bored with being ignored and leave on his own.

Meanwhile, all this poop stuff is just crap. Let's quit that, shall we? :)

8)


----------------
Listening to:
Lafayette Quartet / Kubalek - Dvorak Quintet in A for Piano & Srings No 2 Op 81 1st mvmt

Shame on you Gurn.

I have created a thread here and posted my art work .

What did I get in return?

Just read the posts.


knight66

I will also add here, that I don't recall M being banned....Rob placed some restrictions on him and he took his leave and then subsequently returned. In fact, I can recall two such leavetakings.

If, Saul, you have really decided to ignore M and that you will not be making further response; then we can put the day in the diary as one which produced real progress.

Now, if anyone sees posts that break the rules, let us know.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: Saul on June 08, 2008, 10:29:46 AM
Shame on you Gurn.

I have created a thread here and posted my art work .

What did I get in return?

Just read the posts.



I've read them all, Saul. In this case, your motives were probably just as you say. That is frequently not the case. And the accusations that you immediately revert to primitive defensiveness are quite valid.

Poster: "I don't really like that"

Saul: "You are an idiot"

How can any exchange fail to deteriorate from there?

In any case, I have read far too many of your posts over the years that you could convince me at this point in time that you aren't intentionally trying to get people to rag back at you so you can create your own chaos. I honestly don't believe that anyone is SO insensitive that he can't foresee the reaction that will be forthcoming from some of the things you post. Therefore, since I think you are actually a lot smarter than you would have people believe, I can only think that you do it on purpose. My advice then is "ignore him".

8)

----------------
Listening to:
Lafayette Quartet / Kubalek - Dvorak Quintet in A for Piano & Srings No 2 Op 81 2nd mvmt
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

M forever

Quote from: knight on June 08, 2008, 10:35:31 AM
I will also add here, that I don't recall M being banned....Rob placed some restrictions on him and he took his leave and then subsequently returned.

No, M got totally banned, and in the wake of that, several other posters left (among them Nigel W.) in protest to the ban and especially because it was the result of a confrontation between me and Saul, of all people, who really is more or less the most superfluous and annoying poster here. I don't remember exactly about what it was though, but maybe it will come back to me...

Saul

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on June 08, 2008, 10:36:57 AM
I've read them all, Saul. In this case, your motives were probably just as you say. That is frequently not the case. And the accusations that you immediately revert to primitive defensiveness are quite valid.

Poster: "I don't really like that"

Saul: "You are an idiot"

How can any exchange fail to deteriorate from there?

In any case, I have read far too many of your posts over the years that you could convince me at this point in time that you aren't intentionally trying to get people to rag back at you so you can create your own chaos. I honestly don't believe that anyone is SO insensitive that he can't foresee the reaction that will be forthcoming from some of the things you post. Therefore, since I think you are actually a lot smarter than you would have people believe, I can only think that you do it on purpose. My advice then is "ignore him".

8)

----------------
Listening to:
Lafayette Quartet / Kubalek - Dvorak Quintet in A for Piano & Srings No 2 Op 81 2nd mvmt

Try to read from the very first posts in this thread and see who began this whole thing.

knight66

Quote from: M forever on June 08, 2008, 10:58:28 AM
No, M got totally banned, and in the wake of that, several other posters left (among them Nigel W.) in protest to the ban and especially because it was the result of a confrontation between me and Saul, of all people, who really is more or less the most superfluous and annoying poster here. I don't remember exactly about what it was though, but maybe it will come back to me...

No you did not, though Nigel did leave when he was told you had decided to leave. Rob placed some restrictions on the way you could post and after a short time you decided you would rather not be here. You joined the new site; no one had any restrictions on them at that point.

I even recall your leavetaking, it excoriated everyone on the site and claimed no one was worth conversing with.

I am certain of what I am saying, I am also sure you are not trying it on; but have simply forgotten the circumstances. Rob has virtually never banned anyone.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

mn dave

Keep telling yourselves, it's only a message board, it's only a message board...

knight66

You are right, this is a virtual world and it contains virtual lives. This sprawling dysfunctional family that bites and squabbles is not reality. I am thankful for that, big time.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.