Favourite symphony no. 3

Started by Cosi bel do, November 26, 2014, 06:49:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The greates of all third symphonies ?

Beethoven's (Eroica)
Mendelssohn's (Scottish)
Schumann's (Rhenish)
Brahms's
Bruckner's
Tchaikovsky's (Polish)
Saint-Saëns's (Organ symphony)
Mahler's
Sibelius's
Scriabin's (Divine Poem)
Glière's (Ilya Muromets)
Prokofiev's
Rachmaninov's
Khachaturian's
Gorecki's (of Sorrowful Songs)
Other (which one ?)

Cosi bel do

I don't exactly know why, but there are numbers that seem to be perfect synonyms of greatness. Apart from 9, it is the case of 3 for instance...

Of course this is a selection, don't hesitate to give another one if it's your favourite :)

It's great that we can do many polls with that same idea :D

North Star

#1
I suppose Stravinsky's Symphony in C is his no. 3.

Quite a few I'd like to see on the list: Dvořák, Schnittke, Lutoslawski, Prokofiev, Schuman, Mendelssohn, Hartmann, Ives, Rakhmaninov, Nielsen, Szymanowski.

Eroica is probably the greatest one, but I'll vote Brahms.
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

Cosi bel do

Oh you're right, I'll add at least Mendelssohn, Rachmaninov, Prokofiev and Nielsen. I can't put 20 of them though, or should I ?

North Star

Quote from: Discobolus on November 26, 2014, 07:06:39 AM
Oh you're right, I'll add at least Mendelssohn, Rachmaninov, Prokofiev and Nielsen. I can't put 20 of them though, or should I ?
Well, why not, people will still pick the LvB.  0:)
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

Cosi bel do

Okay I added a few of them, others can still be mentioned in the thread but I don't think they have a chance to win ;)

I did reset the votes though, so if you have already, please vote again !

Jo498

Now that's much easier for me. Beethoven's Eroica by a considerable margin, than maybe Brahms and Mendelssohn. I prefer Bruckner's to the more famous 4th although I have not really sorted out the different versions of #3 and formed opinions on them
Schumann's Rhenish is for me an interesting but flawed piece with a great first movement a nice folksy second one and very interesting brass chorale cologne cathedral 4th movement, but a trivial andante intermezzo and rather pointless finale, so it does not really make a convincing whole for me.
Mahler's 3rd is just too long for me, I never really got into the piece, despite a few nice bits.
Don't much care for Tchaik, Sibelius and Saint Saens at this number...

EDIT: Rachmaninoff's, Scriabin's, Prokofieff's and Ives' I have only heard a few times each and don't really know them. But I completely forgot Nielsen's which is a very cool piece although his 4th and 5th are understandably more famous. It is also one of the few pieces where I find the vocalizing voices haunting, not silly. It would probably be one of my top 5 3rd symphonies.
Tout le malheur des hommes vient d'une seule chose, qui est de ne savoir pas demeurer en repos, dans une chambre.
- Blaise Pascal

mszczuj


Cosi bel do

Khachaturian is one of my favourites actually, I was dumb to forget him and added him without changing the votes.

Brian

#8
Personal favourites, in order!

1. Beethoven
2. Sibelius
3. Dvorak
4. Mahler
5. Roussel
6. Nielsen
7. Brahms
8. Gliere
9. Martinu
10. Schumann
HONOURABLE MENTION: Atterberg (finale only)

EDIT: OH DANG IT I FORGOT DVORAK AND ROUSSEL list updated

Cosi bel do

If I had to put them in order I think I would say :

1. Mahler
2. Beethoven (very close actually, maybe a tie...)
3. Mendelssohn
4. Glière
5. Bruckner
Then, Khachaturian, Prokofiev, Brahms, Schumann would come.
Gorecki would be last anyway :)

Jay F

1. Mahler
2. Beethoven
3-20 tie. The rest

Sergeant Rock

#11
Singling out a Third is even more impossible than a Ninth. I'm faced with these real choices:


Nielsen
Atterberg
Bruckner
Sibelius
Havergal Brian
Beethoven
Roy Harris
William Schuman
Schumann
Vaughan Williams
Magnard
Mahler
Honegger
Rautavarra
Roussel
Saint-Saens

I abstain.

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Karl Henning

#12
Quote from: Sergeant Rock on November 26, 2014, 07:56:30 AM
Singling out a Third is even more impossible than a Ninth. I'm faced with these real choices:


Nielsen
Atterberg
Bruckner
Sibelius
Havergal Brian
Beethoven
Roy Harris
William Schuman
Schumann
Vaughan Williams
Magnard
Mahler
Honegger
Rautavarra
Roussel
Saint-Saens

I abstain.

Sarge


Glad to see both RVW & Schuman mentioned.  Thanks, Sarge!
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

Ken B

My answer is clear, LvB, but take him out and it's a struggle between Brahms, Saint-Saens, and Bruckner.

Ken B

#14
Quote from: North Star on November 26, 2014, 07:03:48 AM
I suppose Stravinsky's Symphony in C is his no. 3.


??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???
That's right and I forgot.  :(
I think I want to change my vote.

Yes I want to change my vote. Stravinsky Symphony in C

(if North Star can prove Sibelius's 7th is actually his third I'll change it again  :laugh:)

Discobulus, can you set it so we can retract our vote and change it?

bhodges

For greatest, I voted Beethoven. But the one I love is Mahler.

--Bruce

ZauberdrachenNr.7

#16
this is a killer - so I went with Brahms's, a work I listen to more than his other symphonies and that never fails to intrigue, captivate, and delight.  He prob. would have chosen the Eroica

Someone needs to convince me that these polls are (not necessarily in this order) :  1.) valid intellectually, as - for example - in providing increased perspective on the works in question*; 2.) fun;  3.) physically and psychologically healthy; 4.) Not torture.   ??? :laugh: Sounds like another poll...pick one. 

* There may be some in inciting replays, now must listen to Sibelius's 3rd - never ranked it as high as #2, 5, 6, and 7.

Ken B

Quote from: ZauberdrachenNr.7 on November 26, 2014, 09:26:46 AM


* There may be some in inciting replays, now must listen to Sibelius's 3rd - never ranked it as high as #2, 5, 6, and 7.

Sibelius was a tidy man. 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 5 < 6 < 7.


ZauberdrachenNr.7

Quote from: Ken B on November 26, 2014, 09:29:18 AM
Sibelius was a tidy man. 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 5 < 6 < 7.

:laugh: :laugh: That thought occurred to me as I was typing those numbers, but I was trying to appear more discerning in regard to the man. 

North Star

Quote from: karlhenning on November 26, 2014, 08:52:36 AM
Glad to see both RVW &amp; Schuman mentioned.  Thanks, Sarge!
+1.
I don't know how I managed to forget RVW, definitely among my favourite Thirds.
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr